Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386384›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation - methods of preparation and preservation.

Martina Polachova, Magdalena Netukova, Oldrich Benada, Tomas Kucera, Vojtech Kolin, Alina-Dana Baxant, Zuzana Sirolova, Pavel Studeny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martina PolachovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. martina.polachova@fnkv.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-7956
Magdalena NetukovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.
Oldrich BenadaInstitute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4 - Krč, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.
Tomas KuceraInstitute of Histology and Embryology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, Prague 10, 128 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Vojtech KolinDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.
Alina-Dana BaxantDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.
Zuzana SirolovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.
Pavel StudenyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 350321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find the most suitable method to create a safe high quality product, we want to prove the possibility of using a single donor cornea for more than one patient. We would also like to verify the feasibility of making more corneal lenticules after the removal of a corneal endothelium for DMEK transplantation.

methodsWe provided morphological (histology, scanning electron microscope) and microbiological analysis in order to compare different methods of corneal lenticule and corneal stromal lamellae preparation and preservation. We also tested the surgical handling of the tissue to secure a safe manipulation of the tissue for clinical use. We compared two methods of corneal lenticule preparation: microkeratome dissection and femtosecond laser. As methods of preservation, we tested hypothermia, cryopreservation at -80 degrees Celsius in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and storage at room temperature with glycerol. Some intrastromal lenticules and lamellae in each group were previously irradiated with gamma radiation of 25 kGy (KiloGray).

resultsCorneal stromal lamellae prepared with a microkeratome have a smoother cut - side surface compared to lamellae prepared with a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser preparation caused more irregularities on the surface and we detected more conglomerates of the fibrils, while lamellae made with microkeratome had more sparse network. Using femtosecond laser, we were able to make more than five lenticules from a single donor cornea. Gamma irradiation led to damage of collagen fibrils in corneal stroma and a loss of their regular arrangement. Corneal tissue stored in glycerol showed collagen fibril aggregates and empty spaces between fibrils caused by dehydration. Cryopreserved tissue without previous gamma irradiation showed the most regular structure of the fibrils comparable to storage in hypothermia.

conclusionOur results suggest that formation of a corneal lenticule lamellae by microkeratome results in smoother corneal lenticules, while being much cheaper than formation by femtosecond laser. Gamma irradiation of 25 kGy caused damage of the collagen fibres as well as their network arrangement, which correlated with loss of transparency and stiffer structure. These changes impair possible surgical utilisation of gamma irradiated corneas. Storage in glycerol at room temperature and cryopreservation had similar outcomes and we believe that both methods are appropriate and safe for further clinical use .

Indexed as

GlycerolHypothermiaCollagenCorneaCorneal StromaDimethyl SulfoxideHumansCollagenDimethyl SulfoxideGlycerolCorneal lenticule implantationCorneal stromal lamellaCorneal tissue cryopreservationCorneal tissue gamma-irradiationCorneal tissue preparationEffective corneal tissue utilization

Identifiers

PMID37386384
PMCPMC10308633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.