ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Upgrade risk of image-targeted radial scar and complex sclerosing lesions diagnosed at needle-guided biopsy: a retrospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of malignancy after diagnosis of radial sclerosing lesion without atypia.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the upgrade rate of radial scar (RS) and complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy. The secondary objectives were to determine the new atypia rate after surgery and to assess the diagnosis of subsequent malignancy on follow-up.
methodsThis single-institution retrospective study had IRB approval. All image-targeted RS and CSL diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy between 2007 and 2020 were reviewed. Patient demographics, imaging presentation, biopsy characteristics, histological report, and follow-up data were collected.
resultsDuring the study period, 120 RS/CSL were diagnosed in 106 women (median age, 43.5 years; range, 23-74), and 101 lesions were analyzed. At biopsy, 91 (90.1%) lesions were not associated with another atypia or malignancy and 10 (9.9%) were associated with another atypia. Out of the 91 lesions that were not associated with malignancy or atypia, 75 (82.4%) underwent surgical excision, and one upgrade to low-grade CDIS was detected (1.3%). Among the 10 lesions initially associated with another atypia, 9 were surgically excised and no malignancy was detected. After a median follow-up of 47 months (range: 12-143 months), two (1.98%) developed malignancy in a different quadrant; in both cases, another atypia was present at biopsy.
conclusionWe found a low upgrade rate on image-detected RS/CSL, with or without another atypia associated. Associated atypia was underdiagnosed at biopsy in almost one-third of cases. Subsequent cancer risk could not be established because the only two cases were associated with another high-risk lesion (HRL), which might have increased the patient's risk of developing malignancy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our upgrade rates of RS/CSL with or without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy are almost as low as the ones reported with larger sampling methods. This result has particular importance in places with limited accessibility to US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy. KEY POINTS: •New evidence is showing lower upgrade rates of RS and CSL after surgery, leading to a more conservative management with extensive sampling using VAB or VAE. •Our study showed only one upgrade to a low-grade DCIS after surgery, yielding an upgrade rate of 1.33%. •During follow-up, no new malignancy was detected in the same quadrant where RS/CSL was diagnosed, including patients without surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.