Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386292›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2023

The added value of spinal cord lesions to disability accrual in multiple sclerosis.

Serena Ruggieri, Luca Prosperini, Maria Petracca, Alessandra Logoteta, Emanuele Tinelli, Laura De Giglio, Olga Ciccarelli, Claudio Gasperini, Carlo Pozzilli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Data-Driven Fatigue Trajectories in Multiple Sclerosis and Their Predictors.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Association of Spinal Cord Radiomic Features and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Serena RuggieriDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. serena.ruggieri@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5287-3290
Luca ProsperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maria PetraccaDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra LogotetaDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele TinelliUnit of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Laura De GiglioNeurology Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Olga CiccarelliQueen Square MS Centre, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Claudio GasperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carlo PozzilliDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITMagna Graecia University · ITNational Institute for Health Research · GBOspedale San Filippo Neri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord MRI is not routinely performed for multiple sclerosis (MS) monitoring. Here, we explored whether spinal cord MRI activity offers any added value over brain MRI activity for clinical outcomes prediction in MS. This is a retrospective, monocentric study including 830 MS patients who underwent longitudinal brain and spinal cord MRI [median follow-up 7 years (range: < 1-26)]. According to the presence (or absence) of MRI activity defined as at least one new T2 lesion and/or gadolinium (Gd) enhancing lesion, each scan was classified as: (i) brain MRI negative/spinal cord MRI negative; (ii) brain MRI positive/spinal cord MRI negative; (iii) brain MRI negative/spinal cord MRI positive; (iv) brain MRI positive/spinal cord MRI positive. The relationship between such patterns and clinical outcomes was explored by multivariable regression models. When compared with the presence of brain MRI activity alone: (i) Gd + lesions in the spine alone and both in the brain and in the spinal cord were associated with an increased risk of concomitant relapses (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.1, p < 0.001 and OR = 4.9, 95% CI 4.6-9.1, p < 0.001, respectively); (ii) new T2 lesions at both locations were associated with an increased risk of disability worsening (HR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1, p = 0.05). Beyond the presence of brain MRI activity, new spinal cord lesions are associated with increased risk of both relapses and disability worsening. In addition, 16.1% of patients presented asymptomatic, isolated spinal cord activity (Gd + lesions). Monitoring MS with spinal cord MRI may allow a more accurate risk stratification and treatment optimization.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisSpinal Cord DiseasesBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSpinal CordAsymptomatic lesionsDisability accrualSpinal cord MRITreatment optimization

Identifiers

PMID37386292
PMCPMC10511608
OpenAlexW4382601817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.