Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386279›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Positive rate of wheat allergens in the Chinese allergic population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fengmei Yang, Xinyi Zhao, Wenfeng Liu, Bo Zhou, Lili Deng, Hongbing Chen, Zhuo Zhang, Lin Zhou

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Food Allergy in Children in China.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Early Origins of Asthma and Allergies: Clues From Studies in China.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. GZMK-expressing CD8Nature · 2025
    Article
  5. Wheat-Related Disorders in Children: A 360-Degree View.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fengmei Yang *School of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China.
Xinyi Zhao *School of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China.
Wenfeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330047, China.
Bo ZhouSchool of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China.
Lili DengSchool of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China.
Hongbing ChenState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330047, China.
Zhuo ZhangSchool of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China. zhangzhuo@symc.edu.cn.
Lin ZhouSchool of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, 110034, China. zhoulin@symc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalence of allergic diseases has increased significantly, causing great concern, and wheat, as one of the top 8 food allergens, is a common allergy trigger. Nevertheless, reliable estimates of the positivity rate of wheat allergens in the allergic population in China are still lacking. The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the positive detection rate of wheat allergens in the Chinese allergic population and further provide a reference for the prevention of allergy. CNKI, CQVIP, WAN-FANG DATA, Sino Med, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were retrieved. Related research and case reports about the positive rate of wheat allergen in the Chinese allergic population published from inception to June 30, 2022, were searched, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata software. The pooled positive rate of wheat allergens and 95% confidence interval were calculated by random effect models, and the publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. A total of 13 articles were included for the final meta-analysis, in which wheat allergen detection methods involved only serum sIgE testing and SPT assessment. The results showed that the wheat allergen positivity detection rate in Chinese allergic patients was 7.30% (95% CI 5.68-8.92%). Subgroup analysis showed that the positivity rate of wheat allergens was influenced by region, but hardly by age and assessment method. The positive rates of wheat allergy in the population with allergic diseases were 2.74% (95% CI 0.90-4.58%) and 11.47% (95% CI 7.08-15.87%) in southern and northern China, respectively. In particular, the positive rates of wheat allergens were greater than 10% in Shaanxi, Henan and Nei Mongol, all of which belong to the northern region. These results suggest that wheat allergens are an important cause of sensitization in allergic populations from northern China, and therefore attention should be paid to early prevention in high-risk populations.

Indexed as

AllergensEast Asian PeopleHypersensitivityTriticumChinaEthnicityHumansAllergens

Identifiers

PMID37386279
PMCPMC10310853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.