ArticleInternational orthopaedics2023
Risk stratification by nomogram of deep learning radiomics based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in knee meniscus injury.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo construct and validate a nomogram model that integrated deep learning radiomic features based on multiparametric MRI and clinical features for risk stratification of meniscus injury.
methodsA total of 167 knee MR images were collected from two institutions. All patients were classified into two groups based on the MR diagnostic criteria proposed by Stoller et al. The automatic meniscus segmentation model was constructed through V-net. LASSO regression was performed to extract the optimal features correlated to risk stratification. A nomogram model was constructed by combining the Radscore and clinical features. The performance of the models was evaluated by ROC analysis and calibration curve. Subsequently, the model was simulated by junior doctors in order to test its practical application effect.
resultsThe Dice similarity coefficients of automatic meniscus segmentation models were all over 0.8. Eight optimal features, identified by LASSO regression, were employed to calculate the Radscore. The combined model showed a better performance in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.95) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.93). The calibration curve indicated a better accuracy of the combined model than either the Radscore or clinical model alone. The simulation results showed that the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors increased from 74.9 to 86.2% after using the model.
conclusionDeep learning V-net demonstrated great performance in automatic meniscus segmentation of the knee joint. It was reliable for stratifying the risk of meniscus injury of the knee by nomogram which integrated the Radscores and clinical features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.