Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386196›Full record

ArticleOecologia2024

Opening a can of worms: a test of the co-infection facilitation hypothesis.

Maria L Rodgers, Daniel I Bolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria L RodgersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. mlrodge2@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-1303
Daniel I BolnickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.

Funding

Reciprocal genetics of recently-evolved vertebrate immunity and peritoneal helminth counter-adaptationR01AI123659 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Daniel Imara Bolnick · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123659NIH HHS 1R01AI123659-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic infections are a global occurrence and impact the health of many species. Coinfections, where two or more species of parasite are present in a host, are a common phenomenon across species. Coinfecting parasites can interact directly or indirectly via their manipulation of (and susceptibility to) the immune system of their shared host. Helminths, such as the cestode Schistocephalus solidus, are well known to suppress immunity of their host (threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus), potentially facilitating other parasite species. Yet, hosts can evolve a more robust immune response (as seen in some stickleback populations), potentially turning facilitation into inhibition. Using wild-caught stickleback from 20 populations with non-zero S. solidus prevalence, we tested an a priori hypothesis that S. solidus infection facilitates infection by other parasites. Consistent with this hypothesis, individuals with S. solidus infections have 18.6% higher richness of other parasites compared to S. solidus-uninfected individuals from the same lakes. This facilitation-like trend is stronger in lakes where S. solidus is particularly successful but is reversed in lakes with sparse and smaller cestodes (indicative of stronger host immunity). These results suggest that a geographic mosaic of host-parasite co-evolution might lead to a mosaic of between-parasite facilitation/inhibition effects.

Indexed as

CoinfectionSmegmamorphaAnimalsHumansLakesCoinfectionFacilitationGasterosteusIndirect interactionsSchistocephalus

Identifiers

PMID37386196
PMCPMC10756930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.