Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386144›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Humanity's diverse predatory niche and its ecological consequences.

Chris T Darimont, Rob Cooke, Mathieu L Bourbonnais, Heather M Bryan, Stephanie M Carlson, James A Estes, Mauro Galetti, Taal Levi, Jessica L MacLean, Iain McKechnie and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When humans shield predators from danger.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Chris T Darimont *Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. darimont@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2799-6894
Rob Cooke *UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. RobOke@ceh.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0601-8888
Mathieu L BourbonnaisDepartment of Earth, Environmental, and Geographic Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Heather M BryanRaincoast Conservation Foundation, Sidney, BC, Canada.
Stephanie M CarlsonDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3055-6483
James A EstesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Mauro GalettiSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Biodiversity, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Taal LeviDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Jessica L MacLeanDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6262-1855
Iain McKechnieDepartment of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4989-2711
Paul C PaquetDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Boris WormDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
University of Victoria · CADalhousie University · CAFlorida International University · USOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife · USUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although humans have long been predators with enduring nutritive and cultural relationships with their prey, seldom have conservation ecologists considered the divergent predatory behavior of contemporary, industrialized humans. Recognizing that the number, strength and diversity of predator-prey relationships can profoundly influence biodiversity, here we analyze humanity's modern day predatory interactions with vertebrates and estimate their ecological consequences. Analysing IUCN 'use and trade' data for ~47,000 species, we show that fishers, hunters and other animal collectors prey on more than a third (~15,000 species) of Earth's vertebrates. Assessed over equivalent ranges, humans exploit up to 300 times more species than comparable non-human predators. Exploitation for the pet trade, medicine, and other uses now affects almost as many species as those targeted for food consumption, and almost 40% of exploited species are threatened by human use. Trait space analyses show that birds and mammals threatened by exploitation occupy a disproportionally large and unique region of ecological trait space, now at risk of loss. These patterns suggest far more species are subject to human-imposed ecological (e.g., landscapes of fear) and evolutionary (e.g., harvest selection) processes than previously considered. Moreover, continued overexploitation will likely bear profound consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem function.

Indexed as

EcosystemUrsidaeAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEcologyPredatory Behavior

Identifiers

PMID37386144
PMCPMC10310721
OpenAlexW4382631963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.