ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Clinical and molecular analysis of cilia-associated gene signature for prognostic prediction in glioma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of transcriptome and DNA methylation reveals the mechanism of cilia-related genes in recurrent miscarriage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CLIC3 emerges as a novel prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer through integrated multi-omics analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGlioma is a highly malignant and unfavorable cancer in the brain. Recent evidence highlights the vital role of cilia-related pathways as novel regulators of glioma development. However, the prognostic potential of ciliary pathways in glioma is still ambiguous. In this study, we aim to construct a gene signature using cilia-related genes to facilitate the prognostication of glioma.
methodsA multi-stage approach was employed to build the ciliary gene signature for prognostication of glioma. The strategy involved the implementation of univariate, LASSO, and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses based on TCGA cohort, followed by independent validation in CGGA and REMBRANDT cohort. The study further revealed molecular differences at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels between distinct groups.
resultsA prognostic tool utilizing a 9-gene signature based on ciliary pathways was developed to assess the clinical outcomes of glioma patients. The risk scores generated by the signature demonstrated a negative correlation with patient survival rates. The validation of the signature in an independent cohort reinforced its prognostic capabilities. In-depth analysis uncovered distinctive molecular characteristics at the genomic, transcriptomic, and protein-interactive levels in the high- and low-risk groups. Furthermore, the gene signature was able to predict the sensitivity of glioma patients to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs.
conclusionThis study has established the utility of a ciliary gene signature as a reliable prognostic predictor of glioma patient survival. Findings not only enhance our comprehension of the intricate molecular mechanisms of cilia pathways in glioma, but also hold significant clinical implications in directing chemotherapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.