Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Non-contrast CT synthesis using patch-based cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (Cycle-GAN) for radiomics and deep learning in the era of COVID-19.

Reza Kalantar, Sumeet Hindocha, Benjamin Hunter, Bhupinder Sharma, Nasir Khan, Dow-Mu Koh, Merina Ahmed, Eric O Aboagye, Richard W Lee, Matthew D Blackledge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dopaminergic PET to SPECT domain adaptation: a cycle GAN translation approach.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reza Kalantar *Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, the Institute of Cancer, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Sumeet Hindocha *Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, the Institute of Cancer, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Benjamin HunterCancer Imaging Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Bhupinder SharmaDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, the Institute of Cancer, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Nasir KhanDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
Dow-Mu KohDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
Merina AhmedLung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
Eric O AboagyeCancer Imaging Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Richard W LeeEarly Diagnosis and Detection Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-3406
Matthew D BlackledgeDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, the Institute of Cancer, London, SM2 5NG, UK. matthew.blackledge@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C309/A31316Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handcrafted and deep learning (DL) radiomics are popular techniques used to develop computed tomography (CT) imaging-based artificial intelligence models for COVID-19 research. However, contrast heterogeneity from real-world datasets may impair model performance. Contrast-homogenous datasets present a potential solution. We developed a 3D patch-based cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycle-GAN) to synthesize non-contrast images from contrast CTs, as a data homogenization tool. We used a multi-centre dataset of 2078 scans from 1,650 patients with COVID-19. Few studies have previously evaluated GAN-generated images with handcrafted radiomics, DL and human assessment tasks. We evaluated the performance of our cycle-GAN with these three approaches. In a modified Turing-test, human experts identified synthetic vs acquired images, with a false positive rate of 67% and Fleiss' Kappa 0.06, attesting to the photorealism of the synthetic images. However, on testing performance of machine learning classifiers with radiomic features, performance decreased with use of synthetic images. Marked percentage difference was noted in feature values between pre- and post-GAN non-contrast images. With DL classification, deterioration in performance was observed with synthetic images. Our results show that whilst GANs can produce images sufficient to pass human assessment, caution is advised before GAN-synthesized images are used in medical imaging applications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37386097
PMCPMC10310777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.