ArticleScientific reports2023
Touch events and human activities for continuous authentication via smartphone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review on Secure Authentication Mechanisms for Mobile Security.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The security of modern smartphones is related to the combination of Continuous Authentication approaches, Touch events, and Human Activities. The approaches of Continuous Authentication, Touch Events, and Human Activities are silent to the user but are a great source of data for Machine Learning Algorithms. This work aims to develop a method for continuous authentication while the user is sitting and scrolling documents on the smartphone. Touch Events and Smartphone Sensor Features (from the well-known H-MOG Dataset) were used with the addition, for each sensor, of the feature called Signal Vector Magnitude. Several Machine Learning Models have been considered with different experiment setups, 1-class, and 2-class, for evaluation. The results show that the 1-class SVM achieves an accuracy of 98.9% and an F1-score of 99.4%, considering the selected features and the feature Signal Vector Magnitude very significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.