Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386091›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The full-body illusion changes visual depth perception.

Manuel Bayer, Sophie Betka, Bruno Herbelin, Olaf Blanke, Eckart Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuel BayerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. manuel.bayer@hhu.de.
Sophie BetkaLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, NeuroX Institute & Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Bruno HerbelinLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, NeuroX Institute & Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Olaf BlankeLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, NeuroX Institute & Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Eckart ZimmermannDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing where objects are relative to us implies knowing where we are relative to the external world. Here, we investigated whether space perception can be influenced by an experimentally induced change in perceived self-location. To dissociate real and apparent body positions, we used the full-body illusion. In this illusion, participants see a distant avatar being stroked in virtual reality while their own physical back is simultaneously stroked. After experiencing the discrepancy between the seen and the felt location of the stroking, participants report a forward drift in self-location toward the avatar. We wondered whether this illusion-induced forward drift in self-location would affect where we perceive objects in depth. We applied a psychometric measurement in which participants compared the position of a probe against a reference sphere in a two-alternative forced choice task. We found a significant improvement in task performance for the right visual field, indicated by lower just-noticeable differences, i.e., participants were better at judging the differences of the two spheres in depth. Our results suggest that the full-body illusion is able to facilitate depth perception at least unilaterally, implying that depth perception is influenced by perceived self-location.

Indexed as

IllusionsTouch PerceptionDepth PerceptionDifferential ThresholdEmotionsHumansPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID37386091
PMCPMC10310716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.