ArticleScientific reports2023
Different incidences of diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment since diagnosis according to the course of diabetes diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of SGLT2 Inhibitors for New-Onset Proteinuria Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Preserved Kidney Function.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025 · on this mapObservational
- Associations between income/employment status and diabetes care processes, health behaviors, and health outcomes in Japan: A cross-sectional study using claims data linked to a questionnaire survey.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Nutrient patterns and risk of diabetes mellitus type 2: a case-control study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy since clinical diagnosis of diabetes based on the course of diagnosis in a retrospective cohort study using Japan's medical claims and health checkup data (JMDC Claims Database; 2009-2020). We included patients whose diabetes was first diagnosed at medical facilities (hospitals/clinics). We grouped them by health checkup participation before diagnosis, health checkup results, and antidiabetic medication promptly after the diagnosis. The incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (laser photocoagulation, intraocular injection, or vitrectomy) was compared among the groups. Of 126,696 patients, those who started an antidiabetic medication promptly after diabetes diagnosis without a recent health checkup faced the highest risk of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (1-/5-year cumulative incidence: 3.1%/6.0%). This increased risk was consistently observed across various analyses, including the Cox proportional hazard model, sensitivity analysis restricting to those with an eye examination, and sensitivity analysis using vitrectomy as the outcome. Among patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% at recent health checkups, those who promptly started an antidiabetic medication had a higher risk (1.4%/3.8%) than those who did not (0.7%/2.7%). Taking the information about the course of diabetes diagnosis is important to manage risk stratification for diabetic retinopathy appropriately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.