Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386005›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Increased vaccine sensitivity of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Joseph A Lewnard, Vennis Hong, Jeniffer S Kim, Sally F Shaw, Bruno Lewin, Harpreet Takhar, Marc Lipsitch, Sara Y Tartof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 Reproduction Numbers and Long COVID Prevalences in California State Prisons.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph A LewnardDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, , University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. jLewnard@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8505-8839
Vennis HongDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Jeniffer S KimDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Sally F ShawDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6553-1772
Bruno LewinDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Harpreet TakharDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Marc LipsitchCOVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Sara Y TartofDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. Sara.Y.Tartof@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2336-8476

Funding

Emerging methods and applications for test-negative studies of of infectious disease interventionsR01AI148127 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JEWELL, NICHOLAS P · 2020 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host immune responses are a key source of selective pressure driving pathogen evolution. Emergence of many SARS-CoV-2 lineages has been associated with enhancements in their ability to evade population immunity resulting from both vaccination and infection. Here we show diverging trends of escape from vaccine-derived and infection-derived immunity for the emerging XBB/XBB.1.5 Omicron lineage. Among 31,739 patients tested in ambulatory settings in Southern California from December, 2022 to February, 2023, adjusted odds of prior receipt of 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 COVID-19 vaccine doses were 10% (95% confidence interval: 1-18%), 11% (3-19%), 13% (3-21%), and 25% (15-34%) lower, respectively, among cases infected with XBB/XBB.1.5 than among cases infected with other co-circulating lineages. Similarly, prior vaccination was associated with greater point estimates of protection against progression to hospitalization among cases with XBB/XBB.1.5 than among non-XBB/XBB.1.5 cases (70% [30-87%] and 48% [7-71%], respectively, for recipients of ≥4 doses). In contrast, cases infected with XBB/XBB.1.5 had 17% (11-24%) and 40% (19-65%) higher adjusted odds of having experienced 1 and ≥2 prior documented infections, respectively, including with pre-Omicron variants. As immunity acquired from SARS-CoV-2 infection becomes increasingly widespread, fitness costs associated with enhanced vaccine sensitivity in XBB/XBB.1.5 may be offset by increased ability to evade infection-derived host responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37386005
PMCPMC10310822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.