Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37385898›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2023

Heterogeneity of Response to Methylphenidate in Apathetic Patients in the ADMET 2 Trial.

Krista L Lanctôt, Luc Rivet, Shankar Tumati, Jamie Perin, Krushnaa Sankhe, Danielle Vieira, Jacobo Mintzer, Paul B Rosenberg, David Shade, Alan J Lerner and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Krista L LanctôtSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: krista.lanctot@sunnybrook.ca.
Luc RivetSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shankar TumatiSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jamie PerinBloomberg School of Public Health (JP, DS), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Krushnaa SankheSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle VieiraSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacobo MintzerRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (JM, OB-M), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Paul B RosenbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (PBR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
David ShadeBloomberg School of Public Health (JP, DS), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Alan J LernerUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (AJL), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Prasad R PadalaCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (PRP, KPP), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Olga Brawman-MintzerRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (JM, OB-M), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Christopher H van DyckYale School of Medicine (CHVD), New Haven, CT.
Anton P PorsteinssonUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (APP), Rochester, NY.
Suzanne CraftWake Forest University (SC), Winston-Salem, NC.
Allan I LeveyEmory Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (AIL), Atlanta, GA.
Kalpana P PadalaCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (PRP, KPP), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Nathan HerrmannSunnybrook Research Institute (KLL, LR, ST, KS, DV, NH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Johns Hopkins University · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMedical University of South Carolina · USCase Western Reserve University · USCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Rochester · USWake Forest University · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Wake Forest University School of Medicine Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072947 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE CRAFT · 2021 to 2026
$24.3M
Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease Methyphenidate Trial II (ADMET II)R01AG046543 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HERRMANN, NATHAN, LANCTOT, KRISTA L. · 2014 to 2018
$8.1M
Using connectomics to characterize risk for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG055132 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI JOSEPH, JANE E, MINTZER, JACOBO · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046543NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055132RRD VA I01 RX002638RRD VA I01 RX002961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) found that methylphenidate was effective in treating apathy with a small-to-medium effect size but showed heterogeneity in response. We assessed clinical predictors of response to help determine individual likelihood of treatment benefit from methylphenidate.

designUnivariate and multivariate analyses of 22 clinical predictors of response chosen a priori.

settingData from the ADMET 2 randomized, placebo controlled multi-center clinical trial.

participantsAlzheimer's disease patients with clinically significant apathy. MEASUREMENTS: Apathy assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy domain (NPI-A).

resultsIn total, 177 participants (67% male, mean [SD] age 76.4 [7.9], mini-mental state examination 19.3 [4.8]) had 6-months follow up data. Six potential predictors met criteria for inclusion in multivariate modeling. Methylphenidate was more efficacious in participants without NPI anxiety (change in NPI-A -2.21, standard error [SE]:0.60) or agitation (-2.63, SE:0.68), prescribed cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) (-2.44, SE:0.62), between 52 and 72 years of age (-2.93, SE:1.05), had 73-80 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure (-2.43, SE: 1.03), and more functional impairment (-2.56, SE:1.16) as measured by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living scale.

conclusionIndividuals who were not anxious or agitated, younger, prescribed a ChEI, with optimal (73-80 mm Hg) diastolic blood pressure, or having more impaired function were more likely to benefit from methylphenidate compared to placebo. Clinicians may preferentially consider methylphenidate for apathetic AD participants already prescribed a ChEI and without baseline anxiety or agitation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApathyDementiaMethylphenidateActivities of Daily LivingAgedCholinesterase InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleCholinesterase InhibitorsMethylphenidateapathyMethylphenidatepredictors of responsestimulants

Identifiers

PMID37385898
PMCPMC10765607
OpenAlexW4380757961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.