Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37385739›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Presence of flavoured electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products in US ENDS advertisements, 2015-2020: a content analysis.

M B Moran, Lauren Czaplicki, Lidya Tadesse, Jessica Handy, Kevin Welding, Dannielle Kelley, Ryan David Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M B MoranDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA mmoran22@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-6668
Lauren CzaplickiDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-0990
Lidya TadesseDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jessica HandyDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kevin WeldingDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-6691
Dannielle KelleyCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.
Ryan David KennedyDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (JH-CERSI)U01FD005942 · FDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, G. CALEB · 2016 to 2025
$15.5M
FDA HHS U01 FD005942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesElectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products come in a variety of flavours (eg, fruit, dessert, menthol). Tobacco advertising has historically used flavours as an advertising tactic, but little is known about flavour type and prevalence in ENDS advertisements. We assess the presence of flavoured ENDS in ads over time, by media outlet (eg, magazines, online) and brand.

methodsWe acquired ENDS ads (N=4546) that first ran between 2015-2017 (n=1685; study 1) and 2018-2020 (n=2861; study 2) in outlets including opt-in emails, direct-to-consumer mail (study 1 only), video (TV and online), radio (study 2 only), static online/mobile (ie, ads without video or moving graphics), social media, outdoor (eg, billboards; study 2 only) and consumer magazines. We coded for presence of flavoured ENDS products and flavour type (eg, fruit, tobacco, menthol) and merged this information with metadata on ad year, outlet and manufacturer/retailer brand.

resultsOverall, nearly half (45.5%; n=2067) of ads in our sample featured a flavoured product. Tobacco (59.1%; n=1221), menthol (42.9%; n=887) and fruit (38.6%; n=797) were the most advertised flavours. Over time, the proportion of ads containing tobacco-flavoured and menthol-flavoured ENDS generally decreased before menthol rebounded in 2020. The proportion of ads containing fruit, mint and dessert flavours generally increased over time, with a substantive drop in 2020. We found notable differences in flavoured ENDS advertising by outlet and brand.

conclusionsThe overall presence of flavoured ENDS in our sample of ads remained relatively consistent, with tobacco flavour decreasing over time and some non-tobacco flavours increasing over time until 2020 when the presence decreased.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdvertisingCandyElectronic MailFlavoring AgentsHumansMentholFlavoring AgentsMentholPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINESubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID37385739
PMCPMC10314572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.