Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384770›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An economic evaluation of cattle tick acaricide-resistances and the financial losses in subtropical dairy farms of Ecuador: A farm system approach.

Valeria Paucar-Quishpe, Ximena Pérez-Otáñez, Richar Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Darío Cepeda-Bastidas, Cecilia Pérez-Escalante, Jorge Grijalva-Olmedo, Sandra Enríquez, Susana Arciniegas-Ortega, Luis Sandoval-Trávez, Bryan Benavides-Erazo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Acaricide resistance inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RecombinantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria Paucar-QuishpeInstituto de Investigación en Zoonosis (CIZ), Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-4618
Ximena Pérez-OtáñezInstituto de Investigación en Zoonosis (CIZ), Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Richar Rodríguez-HidalgoInstituto de Investigación en Zoonosis (CIZ), Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-9338-1062
Darío Cepeda-BastidasFacultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-0969
Cecilia Pérez-EscalanteFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Jorge Grijalva-OlmedoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Sandra EnríquezInstituto de Investigación en Zoonosis (CIZ), Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Susana Arciniegas-OrtegaFacultad de Geología, Minas y Petróleo, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Luis Sandoval-TrávezFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Bryan Benavides-ErazoFacultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Sophie O VanwambekeGeorges Lemaitre Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth & Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Claude SaegermanResearch Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis applied to Veterinary Science (UREAR-ULg)/Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH) Center/Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-7436
Lenin Ron-GarridoInstituto de Investigación en Zoonosis (CIZ), Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-9021-4376
Central University of Ecuador · ECUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimates of economic losses in cattle due to tick infestations in subtropical areas are limited, such as in Ecuador. Ticks affect animal production and health, but those direct effects are difficult to estimate since financial exercises carried out in farms consider both costs of the inputs and revenues. This study aims to quantify the costs of inputs involved in milk production and to know the role of acaricide treatment in the production costs on dairy farms in subtropical zones using a farming system approach. Regression and classification trees were used to study the relationship between tick control, acaricide resistance and the presence of high level of tick infestation in the farm system. Even though there was no significant direct association between high levels of tick infestation and the presence of acaricide resistance in ticks, a more complex structure for resistances operates in the manifestation of high tick infestation involving levels of farm technology and no acaricide resistance. Farms with higher levels of technology allocate a lower percentage of sanitary expenses to control ticks (13.41%) in comparison to semi-technified (23.97%) and non-technified farms (32.49%). Likewise, more technified and bigger herds have a lower annual expenditure on acaricide treatment (1.30% of the production budget equivalent to 8.46 USD per animal) compared to non-technified farms where it can represent more than 2.74% of the production budget and where the absence of cypermethrin resistance increases the treatment cost to 19.50 USS per animal annually. These results can motivate the development of information campaigns and control programmes targeted to the reality of small and medium farms that are the most affected in terms of the money they invest in controlling ticks.

Indexed as

AcaricidesRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisEcuadorFarmsAcaricides

Identifiers

PMID37384770
PMCPMC10309988
OpenAlexW4382600158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.