Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384753›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Systemic pro- and anti-inflammatory profiles in acute non-specific low back pain: An exploratory longitudinal study of the relationship to six-month outcome.

Wei-Ju Chang, Luke C Jenkins, Peter Humburg, Valerie Wasinger, David M Walton, Siobhan M Schabrun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei-Ju ChangCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0524-4883
Luke C JenkinsCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter HumburgStats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-6496
Valerie WasingerBioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5338-0869
David M WaltonSchool of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9155-3337
Siobhan M SchabrunCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9083-3107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPro-inflammatory molecules are thought to underpin the development of chronic low back pain (LBP). Although research has begun to explore the association between pro-inflammatory molecules in acute LBP and long-term outcome, no study has explored the role of anti-inflammatory molecules. We aimed to explore whether levels of systemic pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules 1) changed over a period of six months from the onset of acute LBP; 2) differed between people who were recovered (N = 11) and unrecovered (N = 24) from their episode of LBP at six months; 3) baseline psychological factors were related to inflammatory molecule serum concentrations at baseline, three and six months.

methodsWe retrospectively included participants with acute LBP included from a larger prospective trial and examined blood samples for the measurement of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules and measures of pain, disability, and psychological factors at baseline, three and six months.

resultsThe serum concentrations of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules did not differ over time when compared between participants who recovered and those who did not recover at six-month follow-up. At three months, the unrecovered group had higher interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-10 serum concentrations than the recovered group. Baseline psychological factors were not related to inflammatory molecules at any time point. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study showed that levels of systemic inflammatory molecules did not change over the course of LBP, irrespective of whether people were recovered or unrecovered at six months. There was no relationship between acute-stage psychological factors and systemic inflammatory molecules. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the contribution of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules to long-term LBP outcome.

Indexed as

Acute PainLow Back PainAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID37384753
PMCPMC10309993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.