Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Cytomegalovirus in donors for fecal microbiota transplantation, the phantom menace?

Tatiana Galpérine, Ilka Engelmann, Sebastien Hantz, Déborah Postil, Anny Dewilde, Dominique Deplanque, Renaud Martin, Julien Labreuche, Mouna Lazrek, Stéphanie Somers and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02694484 (Search Cytomegalovirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02694484 nacompletednot on this map

Search Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Healthy Volunteers Stools Samples Selected as Potential Donor for Fecal Microbiota Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LimogesRan2016 to 2017Enrolled500ConditionsCMV, Healthy VolunteersArmsBlood and stool samples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IntestinalBMJ open · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatiana GalpérineService of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-1845
Ilka EngelmannLaboratoire de Virologie URL3610, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7489-3786
Sebastien HantzLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, National Reference Center for Herpesviruses (NRCHV), CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.
Déborah PostilDirection of Research and Innovation, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Anny DewildeLaboratoire de Virologie URL3610, Lille, France.
Dominique DeplanqueCIC 1403-Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France.
Renaud MartinDirection of Research and Innovation, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Julien LabreucheSanté Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille France.
Mouna LazrekLaboratoire de Virologie URL3610, Lille, France.
Stéphanie SomersCIC 1403-Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France.
Elodie RibotLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, National Reference Center for Herpesviruses (NRCHV), CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.
Sophie AlainLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, National Reference Center for Herpesviruses (NRCHV), CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9787-1421
Institut de Virologie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has become the preferred treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDI). However, donor screening is a complex process that varies between countries. The primary objective of screening is to prevent the transfer of potential pathogens from the donor to the recipient via feces. Many guidelines recommend Cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing as part of donor screening, but is the risk of CMV transmission well supported by evidence? MATERIALS/

methodsA French prospective cross-sectional multicenter single-arm study estimated the frequency of detection of CMV in the stool of voluntary healthy donors selected for FMT. All preselected donors were tested for CMV antibodies in blood, and if positive, CMV DNA PCR was performed on whole blood and stool. For samples CMV positive in stool PCR, or case of serological markers positive for IgM, we planned isolation of CMV in cell culture.

resultsFrom June 1, 2016, to July 31, 2017, 500 healthy donors (250 per center) were recruited and 483 included. Of these, 301 were CMV seronegative, and 182 tested positive for CMV IgM and/or IgG. Stool CMV PCR was performed in 162 donors. In two cases, the initial analysis was positive, but below the limit of quantification. Repeated PCR tests using Siemens and Altostar assays were negative. No infectious CMV could be detected in cell culture of these two samples and in the stool of 6 CMV IgM-positive donors.

conclusionsOur study shows that healthy volunteers with positive CMV serology do not shed CMV DNA in their stool, as detected by PCR or cell culture. This study provides another argument to remove CMV screening for FMT donors.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsFecal Microbiota TransplantationAntibodies, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesCytomegalovirusHumansImmunoglobulin MProspective StudiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID37384665
PMCPMC10310004
OpenAlexW4382600746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.