Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384624›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2024

Cooperation in the Time of COVID.

Jade Butterworth, David Smerdon, Roy Baumeister, William von Hippel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Psychological Science of Pandemics: Contributions to and Recommendations for Social, Educational, and Health Policy.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jade ButterworthSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-1968-3417
David SmerdonSchool of Economics, University of Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-9069
Roy BaumeisterSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland.
William von HippelResearch With Impact, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9900-0868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans evolved to be hyper-cooperative, particularly when among people who are well known to them, when relationships involve reciprocal helping opportunities, and when the costs to the helper are substantially less than the benefits to the recipient. Because humans' cooperative nature evolved over many millennia when they lived exclusively in small groups, factors that cause cooperation to break down tend to be those associated with life in large, impersonal, modern societies: when people are not identifiable, when interactions are one-off, when self-interest is not tied to the interests of others, and when people are concerned that others might free ride. From this perspective, it becomes clear that policies for managing pandemics will be most effective when they highlight superordinate goals and connect people or institutions to one another over multiple identifiable interactions. When forging such connections is not possible, policies should mimic critical components of ancestral conditions by providing reputational markers for cooperators and reducing the systemic damage caused by free riding. In this article, we review policies implemented during the pandemic, highlighting spontaneous community efforts that leveraged these aspects of people's evolved psychology, and consider implications for future decision makers.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCOVID-19HumansInterpersonal Relationscooperationevolutionary psychologyinformation sharingintragroup processesreciprocityreputationsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID37384624
PMCPMC10311366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.