Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384595›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Economic evaluation of participatory women's groups scaled up by the public health system to improve birth outcomes in Jharkhand, eastern India.

Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Amit Ojha, Rajkumar Gope, Shibanand Rath, Hemanta Pradhan, Suchitra Rath, Amit Kumar, Vikash Nath, Parabita Basu, Andrew Copas and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-2944
Amit OjhaEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Rajkumar GopeEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Shibanand RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Hemanta PradhanEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Suchitra RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Amit KumarEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-3486
Vikash NathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-8192
Parabita BasuEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-3320
Andrew CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tanja A J HouwelingDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-4376
Akay MinzNational Health Mission, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Pradeep BaskeyNational Health Mission, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Manir AhmedNational Health Mission, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Vasudha ChakravarthyDevelopment Solutions, New Delhi, India.
Riza MahantaDevelopment Solutions, New Delhi, India.
Tom PalmerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-0208
Nirmala NairEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Prasanta TripathyEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-8132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 2.4 million newborn infants died in 2020, 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. To achieve the Sustainable Development Target for neonatal mortality reduction, countries with high mortality need to implement evidence-based, cost-effective interventions at scale. Our study aimed to estimate the cost, cost-effectiveness, and benefit-cost ratio of a participatory women's groups intervention scaled up by the public health system in Jharkhand, eastern India. The intervention was evaluated through a pragmatic cluster non-randomised controlled trial in six districts. We estimated the cost of the intervention at scale from a provider perspective, with a 42-month time horizon for 20 districts. We estimated costs using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches. All costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted at 3% per year, and converted to 2020 International Dollars (INT$). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated using extrapolated effect sizes for the impact of the intervention in 20 districts, in terms of cost per neonatal deaths averted and cost per life year saved. We assessed the impact of uncertainty on results through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We also estimated benefit-cost ratio using a benefit transfer approach. Total intervention costs for 20 districts were INT$ 15,017,396. The intervention covered an estimated 1.6 million livebirths across 20 districts, translating to INT$ 9.4 per livebirth covered. ICERs were estimated at INT$ 1,272 per neonatal death averted or INT$ 41 per life year saved. Net benefit estimates ranged from INT$ 1,046 million to INT$ 3,254 million, and benefit-cost ratios from 71 to 218. Our study suggests that participatory women's groups scaled up by the Indian public health system were highly cost-effective in improving neonatal survival and had a very favourable return on investment. The intervention can be scaled up in similar settings within India and other countries.

Identifiers

PMID37384595
PMCPMC10309599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.