Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384342›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2022

VOLUMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF INGUINOSCROTAL SWELLINGS.

S S Dumbuya, O O Ayandipo, I O Smalle, J C Boima, M A Dawo, O A Ajagbe, T O Ogundiran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S S DumbuyaDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, and Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
O O AyandipoDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
I O SmalleDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, and Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
J C BoimaDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, and Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
M A DawoDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, and Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
O A AjagbeDepartment of Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
T O OgundiranDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
University College Hospital, Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: External hernias and scrotal swellings are diverse in presentation and are described in many subjective ways. Aim: To create an objective classification of inguinoscrotal swellings in the rural setting. Patients and methods: It was a prospective study on the measurement of inguinoscrotal swellings volume/contents in a cohort of surgical patients in a provincial general hospital in the north of Sierra Leone over a three-year period. For inguinal hernias and other scrotal swellings, the volume ranges of 0- 500ml were used in the classification; for femoral and other external hernias which generally do not reach 'huge' sizes, the volume ranges of 0-100 ml were used. Results: A total of 962 external hernias and hydroceles were classified over a 3- year period. Most, 610 (63.4%) were inguino-scrotal hernias, others were hydroceles, 303 (31.0%) and femoral hernias, 42 (4.3%). The remaining small number consisted of umbilical (4) and epigastric (3) hernias. For the common conditions of hydroceles, inguinal and femoral hernias, about 50% were 'small', more than 40% were 'large', the rest were giant. The same findings were true for epigastric and umbilical hernias. Conclusion: Using the scale that we adopted, majority of the groin hernias and hydroceles were in the small and large categories with a few giant varieties. Volumetric-based classification of hernias and hydroceles can help surgeons communicate more clearly based on standard rather than arbitrary ascription of descriptive terminologies to these very common surgical entities.

Indexed as

External HerniasScrotal swellingsVolumetric classification

Identifiers

PMID37384342
PMCPMC10295090
OpenAlexW4382502679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.