ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
A Bayesian optimization tunning integrated multi-stacking classifier framework for the prediction of radiodermatitis from 4D-CT of patients underwent breast cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Novel machine-learning model for predicting lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Predicting Response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy in mCRPC Using Machine Learning.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Utilizing radiomics and dosiomics with AI for precision prediction of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A dosiomics model for prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients: machine learning-based study for a closed bore linac.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- An Informative Review of Radiomics Studies on Cancer Imaging: The Main Findings, Challenges and Limitations of the Methodologies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- MRI radiomics-based decision support tool for a personalized classification of cervical disc degeneration: a two-center study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel Bayesian optimization based multi-stacking deep learning platform for the prediction of radiation-induced dermatitis (grade ≥ two) (RD 2+) before radiotherapy, by using multi-region dose-gradient-related radiomics features extracted from pre-treatment planning four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) images, as well as clinical and dosimetric characteristics of breast cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively included 214 patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy after breast surgeries. Six regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated based on three PTV dose -gradient-related and three skin dose-gradient-related parameters (i.e., isodose). A total of 4309 radiomics features extracted from these six ROIs, as well as clinical and dosimetric characteristics, were used to train and validate the prediction model using nine mainstream deep machine learning algorithms and three stacking classifiers (i.e., meta-learners). To achieve the best prediction performance, a Bayesian optimization based multi-parameter tuning technology was adopted for the AdaBoost, random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB) and extra tree (XTree) five machine learning models. The five parameter -tuned learners and the other four learners (i.e., logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Bagging) whose parameters cannot be tuned, all as the primary week learners, were fed into the subsequent meta-learners for training and learning the final prediction model. Results: The final prediction model included 20 radiomics features and eight clinical and dosimetric characteristics. At the primary learner level, on base of Bayesian parameter tuning optimization, the RF, XGBoost, AdaBoost, GBDT, and LGBM models with the best parameter combinations achieved AUC of 0.82, 0.82, 0.77, 0.80, and 0.80 prediction performance in the verification data set, respectively. In the secondary meta-learner lever, compared with LR and MLP meta-learner, the best predictor of symptomatic RD 2+ for stacked classifiers was the GB meta-learner with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91-1.0] and an AUC of 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-0.97] in the training and validation datasets, respectively and the 10 top predictive characteristics were identified. Conclusion: A novel multi-region dose-gradient-based Bayesian optimization tunning integrated multi-stacking classifier framework can achieve a high-accuracy prediction of symptomatic RD 2+ in breast cancer patients than any other single deep machine learning algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.