Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384179›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Parent-implemented augmented communication intervention and young children with Down syndrome: an exploratory report.

MaryAnn Romski, Rose A Sevcik, Andrea Barton-Hulsey, Evelyn Fisher, Marika King, Phebe Albert, Gal Kaldes, Casy Walters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

MaryAnn RomskiDepartments of Communication and Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Rose A SevcikDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andrea Barton-HulseyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Evelyn FisherCenter for Development and Disability, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Marika KingDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Phebe AlbertDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Gal KaldesDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Casy WaltersDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Georgia State University · USFlorida State University · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

AUGMENTED LANGUAGE INTERVENTION FOR TODDLERSR01DC003799 · NIDCD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROMSKI, MARYANN · 2000 to 2004
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Young children with Down syndrome (DS) present with speech and language impairments very early in childhood. Historically, early language intervention for children with DS included manual signs, though recently there has been an interest in the use of speech-generating devices (SGDs). This paper examines the language and communication performance of young children with DS who participated in parent-implemented communication interventions that included SGDs. Specifically, we compared the functional vocabulary usage and communication interaction skills of children with DS who received augmented communication interventions (AC) that included an SGD with those children with DS who received spoken communication intervention (SC). Methods: Twenty-nine children with DS participated in this secondary data analysis. These children were part of one of two longitudinal RCT studies investigating the effectiveness of parent-implemented augmented communication interventions in a larger sample of 109 children with severe communication and language impairments. Results: There were significant differences between children with DS in the AC and SC groups in terms of the number and proportion of functional vocabulary targets used and the total vocabulary targets provided during the intervention at sessions 18 (lab)and 24 (home). Discussion: Overall, the AC interventions provided the children with a way to communicate via an SGD with visual-graphic symbols and speech output, while the children in the SC intervention were focused on producing spoken words. The AC interventions did not hinder the children's spoken vocabulary development. Augmented communication intervention can facilitate the communication abilities of young children with DS as they are emerging spoken communicators.

Indexed as

augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)Down syndromeearly interventionlanguage developmentspeech development

Identifiers

PMID37384179
PMCPMC10299806
OpenAlexW4380630595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.