Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384162›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

Use of visual aids in general practice consultations: A questionnaire-based survey.

Jean-Denis Hoonakker, Florence Adeline-Duflot, Véronique Orcel, Marie-Louise Grudzinski, Mathilde Cognet, Vincent Renard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Enhanced examinations, ambient intelligence and the future of clinical practice.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  3. Communicating cancer treatment with pictogram-based timeline visualizations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Denis HoonakkerDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Florence Adeline-DuflotDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Véronique OrcelDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Marie-Louise GrudzinskiDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Mathilde CognetDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Vincent RenardDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Visual aids (VAs) seem effective to improve doctor-patient communication. The objective was to describe how VAs are used in consultation and what French general practitioners (GPs) expect of them. Methods: Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire among French GPs in 2019. Descriptive and multinominal logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Of the 376 respondents, 70% used VAs at least weekly and 34% daily; 94% considered VAs useful/very useful; 77% felt they did not use VAs enough. Sketches were the most used VAs and considered the most useful. Younger age was significantly associated with a higher rate of use of simple digital images. VAs were mainly used to describe anatomy and facilitate patient comprehension. Main reasons for not using VAs more often were time spent searching, lack of habit and poor quality of available VAs. Many GPs requested a database of good quality VAs. Conclusions: GPs use VAs regularly in consultations but would like to use them more often. Informing GPs of the usefulness of VAs, training them to draw adapted sketches and creating a good quality databank are some possible strategies to increase the use of VAs. Innovation: This study described in detail the use of VAs as tool for doctor-patient communication.

Indexed as

Audiovisual aidsGeneral practiceHealth communicationMedical illustrationPatient education as a topicSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37384162
PMCPMC10294083
OpenAlexW4367048492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.