Russian-language translation and cultural adaptation of the Norwegian 'Patient Experience Questionnaire'.

Mikhail Ionov, Elena Dubinina, Ilya Tregubenko, Nadezhda Zvartau, Alexandra Konradi

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikhail IonovResearch Laboratory on Pathogenesis and Therapy of Arterial Hypertension, Almazov National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Elena DubininaDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Assistance, Russian State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Ilya TregubenkoDepartment of Psychology of Professional Activity and Information Technologies in Education, Russian State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Nadezhda ZvartauResearch Laboratory on Pathogenesis and Therapy of Arterial Hypertension, Almazov National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Alexandra KonradiResearch Laboratory on Pathogenesis and Therapy of Arterial Hypertension, Almazov National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of patient-reported experience measures (PREM) is an unmet need in Russian healthcare. Objective: To translate, adapt culturally, and validate PREM for outpatients. Methods: A core set of questions from the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ, in Norwegian, available in English) was translated to Russian (forward-backward translation). Acceptability, construct validity, and reliability were assessed. Patients aged ≥18 y.o. were invited to complete the questionnaire via QR-code within 24 h after a medical encounter. Results: A questionnaire with adequate conceptual and linguistic equivalence was obtained. For four questions, a rating scale was replaced by Likert-type. A total of 308 responses were received (median age 55 y.o., 52% females). The correlation matrix was factorable. Four factors were extracted using varimax rotation: 1) outcome of this specific visit; 2) communication experiences; 3) communication competency; 4) emotions after this visit. These explained 65.4% of the total variance. Three items were excluded. The model was confirmed to be adequate. The Cronbach alpha was >0.9. Item-total correlation confirmed discriminative validity. Conclusion: These preliminary results show that the Russian version of PEQ, adapted to national features, shows good psychometric properties. External validation is needed for the broad implementation of this PREM. Innovation: This research is first attempt to use PREM in the Russian Federation. The use of quick response codes is feasible and eases survey conduction. The more PREMs are used the higher the quality of healthcare.

Indexed as

Cross-cultural comparisonOutpatientPatient-centered carePatient satisfactionSurveys and questionnairesTranslatingValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID37384153

DOI10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100174

PMCPMC10294072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.