Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384151›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

Identifying the mechanisms of patient-centred communication in secure messages between clinicians and cancer patients.

Aantaki Raisa, Jordan M Alpert, Carma L Bylund, Samah Jarad-Fodeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aantaki RaisaCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jordan M AlpertCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Carma L BylundCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Samah Jarad-FodehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Public Health - Biostatistics, Yale Center for Medical Informatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Identify how patients and clinicians incorporate patient-centered communication (PCC) within secure messaging. Methods: A random sample of 199 secure messages from patient portal communication between patients and clinicians were collected and analyzed. Via manual annotation, the task of tagging target words/phrases in text, we identified five components of PCC: information giving, information seeking, emotional support, partnership, and shared decision-making. Textual analysis was also performed to understand the context of PCC expressions within messages. Results: Information-giving was the predominant ( Conclusion: Secure messaging is mainly used for exchanging information, but other aspects of PCC emerge using this channel of communication. Innovation: Meaningful discussions can occur via secure messaging, and clinicians should be mindful of incorporating PCC when communicating with patients through secure messaging.

Indexed as

Content analysisElectronic health recordsPatient-clinician communicationSecure messaging

Identifiers

PMID37384151
PMCPMC10294087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.