Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384135›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2023

The physical activity at work (PAW) study: a cluster randomised trial of a multicomponent short-break intervention to reduce sitting time and increase physical activity among office workers in Thailand.

Katika Akksilp, Jemima Jia En Koh, Vanessa Tan, Eunice Huiying Tong, Nuttakarn Budtarad, Guo Xueying, Anna Valeria Dieterich, Bee Choo Tai, Andre Matthias Müller, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sedentary Behaviour-A Target for the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katika AkksilpSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Jemima Jia En KohSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Vanessa TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Eunice Huiying TongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Nuttakarn BudtaradHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Guo XueyingSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Anna Valeria DieterichSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Bee Choo TaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Andre Matthias MüllerSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Thomas RouyardHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
Ryota NakamuraHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
Falk Müller-RiemenschneiderSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Yot TeerawattananonSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Cynthia ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGMinistry of Public Health · THHitotsubashi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviour increases the risks of non-communicable diseases. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of the Physical Activity at Work multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in Thai office workers. Methods: Offices under the Ministry of Public Health Thailand, were randomly allocated to the intervention and control group in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by office size. The intervention included individual (pedometer and lottery-based financial incentives), social (group movement breaks), environmental (posters), and organisational (leader encouragement) components. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, participants wore ActiGraph Findings: 282 office workers were recruited and randomly allocated to the control group (142 participants, nine offices) and the intervention group (140 participants, nine offices). The mean age was 38.6 years (SD = 10.4), and 81% were women. There was no evidence of intervention effects on sedentary time during waking hours (-26.8; 95% CI = -69.2 to 15.7 min), physical activity levels, or biomarkers between groups at 6-month. In the adjusted analysis, increases in time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (5.45; 95% CI = -0.15 to 11.1 min) and step count (718; 95% CI = -45 to 1481 steps) during waking hours were observed, although there was no evidence of a difference between groups. Interpretation: The intervention did not significantly reduce sedentary time in Thai office workers. Suboptimal intervention uptake due to Covid-19 pandemic restrictions and loss of statistical power associated with recruitment constraints may explain this result. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the processes of the trial. Funding: The Thai Health Promotion Foundation and the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI).

Indexed as

Physical activityRandomised controlled trialSedentary behaviourWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID37384135
PMCPMC10305858
OpenAlexW4306744406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.