ArticleCureus2023
Benign Intracranial Calcified Lesion or a So-Called Brain Stone: A Challenging Diagnosis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Unilateral Parietal Bone Thickening in a Young Female Donor With a History of a Malignant Brain Neoplasm.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain stone is an umbrella term for benign intracerebral calcifications and may be associated with various diagnoses. The surgical decision should be made on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes, conservative management should be considered, irrespective of the underlying pathology. We present a critical case with a brain stone treated conservatively. A 17-year-old female patient was admitted to our department with a headache. The neurological examination revealed no abnormal findings. Cranial CT and MRI scans showed a contrast-enhanced, highly calcified lesion located deep in the white matter at the level of the left centrum semiovale. Surgery was found unnecessary. The patient presented no neurologic deficits or symptoms during the three-year follow-up period. In this case, the differential diagnosis included arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), cavernomas, calcifying pseudoneoplasms of the neuroaxis (CAPNON), etc. The localization of the lesion, expression of the symptoms, and potential outcomes of a possible surgery should be carefully estimated before making the final decision. In summary, conservative treatment should also be considered for critically located, benign calcified lesions, irrespective of pathology, unless they cause intense neurologic symptoms or deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.