Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384058›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2023

Changing socioeconomic and geographic gradients in cardiovascular disease risk factors among Indians aged 15-49 years - evidence from nationally representative household surveys.

Sarah Wetzel, Pascal Geldsetzer, Sneha Sarah Mani, Aashish Gupta, Kavita Singh, Mohammed K Ali, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, Nikkil Sudharsanan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prerequisite for reproducible science: a call to embrace code sharing.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah WetzelHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal GeldsetzerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sneha Sarah ManiGraduate Group in Demography, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Aashish GuptaHarvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, MA, USA.
Kavita SinghHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mohammed K AliHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.
Nikkil SudharsananHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCentre for Chronic Disease Control · INChan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). CVDs and their metabolic risk factors have historically been concentrated among urban residents with higher socioeconomic status (SES) in LMICs such as India. However, as India develops, it is unclear whether these socioeconomic and geographic gradients will persist or change. Understanding these social dynamics in CVD risk is essential for mitigating the rising burden of CVDs and to reach those with the greatest needs. Methods: Using nationally representative data with biomarker measurements from the fourth (2015-16) and fifth (2019-21) Indian National Family and Health Surveys, we investigated trends in the prevalence of four CVD risk factors: smoking (self-reported), unhealthy weight (BMI ≥25 Findings: Unhealthy weight increased among all social and geographic groups but both the absolute and the relative changes were substantially higher among people with low SES (as measured by education or wealth) and in rural areas. For diabetes and hypertension, the prevalence increased for those from disadvantaged groups while staying constant or even decreasing among the wealthier and more educated. In contrast, smoking consumption declined for all social and geographic groups. Interpretation: In 2015-16, CVD risk factors were higher among more advantaged subpopulations in India. However, between 2015-16 and 2019-21, the prevalence of these risk factors grew more rapidly for less wealthy and less educated subpopulations and those living in rural areas. These trends have resulted in CVD risk becoming far more widespread throughout the population; CVD can no longer be characterized as a wealthy urban phenomenon. Funding: This work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (grant received by NS); the Stanford Diabetes Research Center [grant received by PG] and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub [grant received by PG].

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesDiabetesHypertensionIndiaObesityOverweightRisk factorSmokingSocioeconomic gradientsSocioeconomic statusTobacco consumption

Identifiers

PMID37384058
PMCPMC10305936
OpenAlexW4365520172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.