Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384007›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

Average Indian Glenoid Sizes Are Smaller than All Commercially Available Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review.

Souvik Paul, Manit Arora, Lakhsmana Das, Balgovind S Raja, Roop Bhusan Kalia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Souvik PaulDepartment of Orthopaedics, AMRI Hospitals Mukundapur, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-3664
Manit AroraFortis Hospitals Mohali, Mohali, Punjab India.ORCID 0000-0001-9939-3198
Lakhsmana DasDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhatinda, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2720-6389
Balgovind S RajaDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-0015
Roop Bhusan KaliaDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-5942
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAMRI Hospitals · INFortis Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the variability in glenoid sizes geographically, most of the currently available commercial glenoid component designs are based on the glenoid parameters of the Caucasian population which may not be suitable for the Indian population due to a mismatch between the prosthesis and native anatomy. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the literature to determine the average glenoid anthropometric parameters in the Indian population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases from the date of inception to May 2021. Any observational study conducted on the Indian population measuring the glenoid diameters, glenoid index, version, inclination, or any other glenoid measurements were included in the review. Results: A total of 38 studies were included in this review. The glenoid parameters were assessed on intact cadaveric scapulae in 33 studies, on 3DCT in three studies, and 2DCT in one study. The pooled average of glenoid dimensions are as the following- the superoinferior diameter or height was 34.65 mm, anteroposterior1 diameter or maximum width was 23.72 mm, anteroposterior2 diameter or maximum width of the upper part of the glenoid was 17.05 mm, the glenoid index was 67.88, and the glenoid version was 1.75-degree retroversion. Males were having a mean height of 3.65 mm and maximum width of 2.74 mm larger than the females. A subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between different parts of India in glenoid parameters. Conclusion: The glenoid dimensions in the Indian population are smaller compared to the average European and American populations. The average glenoid maximum width of the Indian population is 1.3 mm smaller than the minimum glenoid baseplate size available in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid components specific to the Indian market need to be designed to reduce glenoid failure attributable to the above findings. Level of evidence: III.

Indexed as

AnthropometryGlenoidGlenoid diameterGlenoid versionIndiaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37384007
PMCPMC10293529
OpenAlexW4366689729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.