Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383825›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

An expertized grapevine disease image database including five grape varieties focused on Flavescence dorée and its confounding diseases, biotic and abiotic stresses.

Malo Tardif, Ahmed Amri, Aymeric Deshayes, Marc Greven, Barna Keresztes, Gaël Fontaine, Laetitia Sicaud, Laetitia Paulhac, Sophie Bentejac, Jean-Pierre Da Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Malo TardifUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.
Ahmed AmriUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.
Aymeric DeshayesUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.
Marc GrevenINRAE, EGFV, Villenave d'Ornon F-33140, France.
Barna KeresztesUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.
Gaël FontaineUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.
Laetitia SicaudBureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac, Cognac FF-16100, France.
Laetitia PaulhacFREDON Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Cognac F-16100, France.
Sophie BentejacGDON de Bordeaux, Beychac et Caillau F-33750, France.
Jean-Pierre Da CostaUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMS, UMR 5218, Talence F-33400, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The grapevine is vulnerable to diseases, deficiencies, and pests, leading to significant yield losses. Current disease controls involve monitoring and spraying phytosanitary products at the vineyard block scale. However, automatic detection of disease symptoms could reduce the use of these products and treat diseases before they spread. Flavescence dorée (FD), a highly infectious disease that causes significant yield losses, is only diagnosed by identifying symptoms on three grapevine organs: leaf, shoot, and bunch. Its diagnosis is carried out by scouting experts, as many other diseases and stresses, either biotic or abiotic, imply similar symptoms (but not all at the same time). These experts need a decision support tool to improve their scouting efficiency. To address this, a dataset of 1483 RGB images of grapevines affected by various diseases and stresses, including FD, was acquired by proximal sensing. The images were taken in the field at a distance of 1-2 meters to capture entire grapevines and an industrial flash was ensuring a constant luminance on the images regardless of the environmental circumstances. Images of 5 grape varieties (Cabernet sauvignon, Cabernet franc, Merlot, Ugni blanc and Sauvignon blanc) were acquired during 2 years (2020 and 2021). Two types of annotations were made: expert diagnosis at the grapevine scale in the field and symptom annotations at the leaf, shoot, and bunch levels on computer. On 744 images, the leaves were annotated and divided into three classes: 'FD symptomatic leaves', 'Esca symptomatic leaves', and 'Confounding leaves'. Symptomatic bunches and shoots were, in addition of leaves, annotated on 110 images using bounding boxes and broken lines, respectively. Additionally, 128 segmentation masks were created to allow the detection of the symptomatic shoots and bunches by segmentation algorithms and compare the results to those of the detection algorithms.

Indexed as

ClassificationDetectionEscaGrapevineGrapevine diseaseProximal sensingRGB images

Identifiers

PMID37383825
PMCPMC10294005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.