ArticleData in brief2023
An expertized grapevine disease image database including five grape varieties focused on Flavescence dorée and its confounding diseases, biotic and abiotic stresses.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral differentiation of three grapevine yellows diseases and symptomatically similar stresses.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A dataset for vineyard disease detection via multispectral imaging.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Grading for grapevine downy mildew and feature extraction methods for predicting abaxial lesions from adaxial leaf images.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Grapevine Research: A Comparative Study with an Extensive Review of Datasets, Diseases, and Techniques Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Smartphone image dataset to distinguish healthy and unhealthy leaves in papaya orchards in Bangladesh.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A novel dataset and deep learning object detection benchmark for grapevine pest surveillance.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The grapevine is vulnerable to diseases, deficiencies, and pests, leading to significant yield losses. Current disease controls involve monitoring and spraying phytosanitary products at the vineyard block scale. However, automatic detection of disease symptoms could reduce the use of these products and treat diseases before they spread. Flavescence dorée (FD), a highly infectious disease that causes significant yield losses, is only diagnosed by identifying symptoms on three grapevine organs: leaf, shoot, and bunch. Its diagnosis is carried out by scouting experts, as many other diseases and stresses, either biotic or abiotic, imply similar symptoms (but not all at the same time). These experts need a decision support tool to improve their scouting efficiency. To address this, a dataset of 1483 RGB images of grapevines affected by various diseases and stresses, including FD, was acquired by proximal sensing. The images were taken in the field at a distance of 1-2 meters to capture entire grapevines and an industrial flash was ensuring a constant luminance on the images regardless of the environmental circumstances. Images of 5 grape varieties (Cabernet sauvignon, Cabernet franc, Merlot, Ugni blanc and Sauvignon blanc) were acquired during 2 years (2020 and 2021). Two types of annotations were made: expert diagnosis at the grapevine scale in the field and symptom annotations at the leaf, shoot, and bunch levels on computer. On 744 images, the leaves were annotated and divided into three classes: 'FD symptomatic leaves', 'Esca symptomatic leaves', and 'Confounding leaves'. Symptomatic bunches and shoots were, in addition of leaves, annotated on 110 images using bounding boxes and broken lines, respectively. Additionally, 128 segmentation masks were created to allow the detection of the symptomatic shoots and bunches by segmentation algorithms and compare the results to those of the detection algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.