Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383704›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2023

Development and External Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Predicting Lung Metastasis in Kidney Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study.

Xinglin Yi, Yuhan Zhang, Juan Cai, Yu Hu, Kai Wen, Pan Xie, Na Yin, Xiangdong Zhou, Hu Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinglin YiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-9043
Yuhan ZhangDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juan CaiDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yu HuDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kai WenDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Pan XieDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Na YinDepartment of Renal Dialysis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiangdong ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-8682
Hu LuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-4024
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of indices widely used to evaluate lung metastasis (LM) in patients with kidney cancer (KC) is insufficient. Therefore, we aimed at developing a model to estimate the risk of developing LM in KC based on a large population size and machine learning algorithms. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables of patients with KC diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. We performed a univariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for LM in patients with KC. Six machine learning (ML) classifiers were established and tuned using the ten-fold cross-validation method. External validation was performed using clinicopathologic information from 492 patients from the Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China. Algorithm performance was estimated by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1 score, clinical decision analysis (DCA), and clinical utility curve (CUC). A total of 52,714 eligible patients diagnosed with KC were enrolled, of whom 2,618 developed LM. Variables of age, sex, race, T stage, N stage, tumor size, histology, and grade were identified as important for the prediction of LM. The extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm performed better than other models in both the internal validation (AUC: 0.913, sensitivity: 0.873, specificity: 0.809, and F1 score: 0.325) and the external validation (AUC: 0.904, sensitivity: 0.750, specificity: 0.878, and F1 score: 0.364). This study established a predictive model for LM in KC patients based on ML algorithms which showed high accuracy and applicative value. A web-based predictor was built using the XGB model to help clinicians make more rational and personalized decisions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37383704
PMCPMC10299882
OpenAlexW4381429457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.