ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2023
Development and External Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Predicting Lung Metastasis in Kidney Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study.
Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with sarcopenia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- The risk prediction models for sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Association between estimated glucose disposal rate and metabolic syndrome in older adults with sarcopenia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based diagnostic models for prevalent metabolic syndrome among patients with disuse muscle atrophy: a comparative study of seven algorithms.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of indices widely used to evaluate lung metastasis (LM) in patients with kidney cancer (KC) is insufficient. Therefore, we aimed at developing a model to estimate the risk of developing LM in KC based on a large population size and machine learning algorithms. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables of patients with KC diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. We performed a univariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for LM in patients with KC. Six machine learning (ML) classifiers were established and tuned using the ten-fold cross-validation method. External validation was performed using clinicopathologic information from 492 patients from the Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China. Algorithm performance was estimated by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1 score, clinical decision analysis (DCA), and clinical utility curve (CUC). A total of 52,714 eligible patients diagnosed with KC were enrolled, of whom 2,618 developed LM. Variables of age, sex, race, T stage, N stage, tumor size, histology, and grade were identified as important for the prediction of LM. The extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm performed better than other models in both the internal validation (AUC: 0.913, sensitivity: 0.873, specificity: 0.809, and F1 score: 0.325) and the external validation (AUC: 0.904, sensitivity: 0.750, specificity: 0.878, and F1 score: 0.364). This study established a predictive model for LM in KC patients based on ML algorithms which showed high accuracy and applicative value. A web-based predictor was built using the XGB model to help clinicians make more rational and personalized decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.