Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383697›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Identification of risk factors for infection after mitral valve surgery through machine learning approaches.

Ningjie Zhang, Kexin Fan, Hongwen Ji, Xianjun Ma, Jingyi Wu, Yuanshuai Huang, Xinhua Wang, Rong Gui, Bingyu Chen, Hui Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ningjie ZhangDepartment of Blood Transfusion, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kexin FanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hongwen JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xianjun MaDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jingyi WuDepartment of Transfusion, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuanshuai HuangDepartment of Transfusion, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xinhua WangDepartment of Transfusion, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rong GuiDepartment of Transfusion, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Bingyu ChenDepartment of Transfusion, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Zugui ZhangInstitute for Research on Equity and Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, United States.
Xiufeng ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Zheng GongSino-Cellbiomed Institutes of Medical Cell & Pharmaceutical Proteins Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Blood Transfusion, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Selecting features related to postoperative infection following cardiac surgery was highly valuable for effective intervention. We used machine learning methods to identify critical perioperative infection-related variables after mitral valve surgery and construct a prediction model. Methods: Participants comprised 1223 patients who underwent cardiac valvular surgery at eight large centers in China. The ninety-one demographic and perioperative parameters were collected. Random forest (RF) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) techniques were used to identify postoperative infection-related variables; the Venn diagram determined overlapping variables. The following ML methods: random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), AdaBoost, Naive Bayesian (NB), Logistic Regression (LogicR), Neural Networks (nnet) and artificial neural network (ANN) were developed to construct the models. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate model performance. Results: We identified 47 and 35 variables with RF and LASSO, respectively. Twenty-one overlapping variables were finally selected for model construction: age, weight, hospital stay, total red blood cell (RBC) and total fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, preoperative creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), RBC count, platelet (PLT) count, prothrombin time, intraoperative autologous blood, total output, total input, aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time, postoperative white blood cell (WBC) count, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), PLT count, hemoglobin (Hb), and LVEF. The prediction models for infection after mitral valve surgery were established based on these variables, and they all showed excellent discrimination performance in the test set (AUC > 0.79). Conclusions: Key features selected by machine learning methods can accurately predict infection after mitral valve surgery, guiding physicians in taking appropriate preventive measures and diminishing the infection risk.

Indexed as

artificial networkcardiac valvular surgeryinfectionLASSOmachine learningrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37383697
PMCPMC10294678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.