Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383642›Full record

ArticlePsychosocial intervention2023

Methodological Challenges in Group-based Randomised Controlled Trials for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Meta-summary.

William Turner, Karen Morgan, Marianne Hester, Gene Feder, Helen Cramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosocial intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William TurnerUniversity of Bristol School for Policy Studies UK School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Karen MorganUniversity of Bristol Bristol Medical School Centre for Academic Primary Care Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK.
Marianne HesterUniversity of Bristol School for Policy Studies UK School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Gene FederUniversity of Bristol Bristol Medical School Centre for Academic Primary Care Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK.
Helen CramerUniversity of Bristol Bristol Medical School Centre for Academic Primary Care Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V049879/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for treatment effects of group-based Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetrators programmes remains, at best, inconclusive. In the present review, systematic/meta-analytic reviews were used to identify randomised controlled trials and a meta-summary approach was employed to identify methodological challenges in the design and conduct of these trials. Of the fifteen studies identified, seven were comparative effectiveness trials. A range of methodological challenges were also identified by the trialists; source of outcome data, treatment modality, attrition and sample characteristics were the most frequently mentioned. Although there are only a few randomised controlled trials compared to non randomised studies, the findings of both highlight the need to invest in the development of innovative and/or combined IPV treatment programmes to address co-occurring issues such as substance use and trauma. The summary of methodological challenges will provide the first step in the development of methods guidance for researchers working in this area.

Indexed as

Batterer interventionDomestic violenceGender-based violenceGroup-based perpetrator programmesPartner abuse

Identifiers

PMID37383642
PMCPMC10294461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.