Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383573›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2022

Exploring the strategies for upgrading the rural unqualified health practitioners in West Bengal, India: A knowledge, attitude and practices assessment-based approach.

Dhiman Debsarma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhiman DebsarmaCentre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Jawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rural Unqualified Health Practitioners (RUHPs) are more common in the village health system in India and other developing countries. They only provides primary care to patients with diarrhea, cough, malaria, dengue, ARI/pneumonia, skin diseases, etc. As they are unqualified so their quality of health practices is substandard and inappropriate to practices. Objective and contribution: The intention of this work was to assess the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of diseases among RUHPs and proposing a blueprint of potential intervention strategies for improving their knowledge and practice. Materials and methods: The study has used a cross-sectional primary data and adopted quantitative approach. For assessment purpose, a composite KAP Score was constructed for two diseases (malaria and dengue). Results: The study observed that the KAP Score amongst the RUHPs are on average (about 50%) in most of the individual variables and composite scores for malaria and dengue in West Bengal, India. Their KAP score increased with age, level of education, working experiences, type of practitioners, using android mobile, work satisfaction, organization membership, attending RMP/Government workshop, heard WHO/IMC treatment protocol. Conclusion: The study suggested multistage interventions includes targeting young practitioners, allopathic and homeopathic quack, launching ubiquitous app-based medical-learning, and government-sponsored workshop should be significant interventions to improve the level of knowledge, change positive attitudes, and adhere to standard health practice.

Identifiers

PMID37383573
PMCPMC10297518
OpenAlexW4309630763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.