ArticleHealth policy OPEN2021
Women's satisfaction with maternal care services in Georgia.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An assessment of women's satisfaction with maternity care during labour and birth in a referral hospital in Namibia.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Challenges and Solutions: A Scoping Review of Maternal Healthcare Access in Rural Georgia.Cureus · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Quality of Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV Service Provision and Its Determinants: The Case of Health Facility Readiness and Mothers' Perspectives.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Disparities and determinants of maternal health services utilization among women in poverty-stricken rural areas of China: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of health care quality. We investigated women's satisfaction with antenatal, natal and immediate postnatal care, as well as the association between women's satisfaction with the care they received and background characteristics. Methods: We conducted a survey in the capital and two regions of Georgia. 400 women, who gave birth to healthy babies during the preceding twelve months before the date of data collection, were the target population. Women's opinion about the organization of maternal care (tangibility, availability, accessibility) and process characteristics (responsiveness, reliability, empathy, communication and courtesy) were measured. Women satisfaction with antenatal, natal and postnatal services was also measured. Results: Women's satisfaction with antenatal, natal, and immediate postnatal services was high. The respondents' perception about the tangibility of maternity houses was quite positive, more than three quarters of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statements that maternity houses/units were attractive and medical equipment was up to date. Regression analysis on satisfaction with antenatal, natal, and immediate postnatal showed that those who paid for services were less satisfied than those who did not pay. Women in urban areas were more satisfied with antenatal and natal services than in rural areas. High educated women were less satisfied than women with the lowest education level. Conclusions: In general, women are satisfied with maternal care in Georgia. The high level of satisfaction can be due to the improvement in structural factors of maternal health care such as tangibility, availability, and accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.