Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383507›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2021

Women's satisfaction with maternal care services in Georgia.

Lela Sehngelia, Milena Pavlova, Wim Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lela SehngeliaDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Milena PavlovaDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Wim GrootDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of health care quality. We investigated women's satisfaction with antenatal, natal and immediate postnatal care, as well as the association between women's satisfaction with the care they received and background characteristics. Methods: We conducted a survey in the capital and two regions of Georgia. 400 women, who gave birth to healthy babies during the preceding twelve months before the date of data collection, were the target population. Women's opinion about the organization of maternal care (tangibility, availability, accessibility) and process characteristics (responsiveness, reliability, empathy, communication and courtesy) were measured. Women satisfaction with antenatal, natal and postnatal services was also measured. Results: Women's satisfaction with antenatal, natal, and immediate postnatal services was high. The respondents' perception about the tangibility of maternity houses was quite positive, more than three quarters of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statements that maternity houses/units were attractive and medical equipment was up to date. Regression analysis on satisfaction with antenatal, natal, and immediate postnatal showed that those who paid for services were less satisfied than those who did not pay. Women in urban areas were more satisfied with antenatal and natal services than in rural areas. High educated women were less satisfied than women with the lowest education level. Conclusions: In general, women are satisfied with maternal care in Georgia. The high level of satisfaction can be due to the improvement in structural factors of maternal health care such as tangibility, availability, and accessibility.

Indexed as

AccessibilityAvailabilityReliabilityResponsivenessSatisfactionTangibility

Identifiers

PMID37383507
PMCPMC10297776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.