Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383504›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2021

Physician descriptions of the influence of pay for performance on medical decision-making.

Beth Jeanette Graefe, JoAnn Foley Markette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beth Jeanette GraefeGrand Canyon University, 3300 W Camelback Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85017, United States.
JoAnn Foley MarketteGrand Canyon University, 3300 W Camelback Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85017, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore physician descriptions of the influence of pay for performance (P4P) programs on their medical decision-making for the delivery of health care through three antecedents of behavior intention-attitude toward program compliance, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms. Study design/setting: This study utilized a qualitative descriptive research methodology to capture physician descriptions through semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Primary data was collected from actively practicing physicians in the United States with P4P experience. Principal findings: The findings imply that multiple factors influence physicians' attitudes toward program compliance summarized by four primary themes: (a) program compliance and beliefs of physicians in delivering patient care, (b) design, control, and performance motivation, (c) physician performance measurements and the opinions of others, and (d) patient care and compensation program considerations. Conclusions: The findings suggest that physician involvement in the design, implementation, communication, and on-going evaluation of P4P models influence physician behavior. The findings also suggest that physicians are motivated by the delivery of what they believe is good patient care more than by P4P financial incentives. Finally, the most influential voices for physician P4P compliance includes their physician peers and administrators. Outside of the larger societal benefit of P4P compliance, individual family, friends, policymakers, payors, and others have little to no influence on physician decision-making.

Indexed as

Behaviour changePay for performance (P4P)Physician compensationTheory of planned behaviorValue-based payment

Identifiers

PMID37383504
PMCPMC10297519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.