Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383499›Full record

ReviewHealth policy OPEN2021

Oral health guidelines in the primary care policies of five selected countries: An integrative review.

João Victor Inglês de Lara, Paulo Frazão

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy OPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

João Victor Inglês de LaraPublic Health Postgraduate Program, Public Health School at University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo FrazãoDepartment of Politics, Management and Health, Public Health School at University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, SP 01246-904, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral conditions remain a major health problem worldwide. Primary Health Care (PHC) has been recognized as a strategy to construct integrated health systems in order to produce the best health outcomes and reduce inequities through its attributes. Nevertheless, oral health integration in PHC remains unclear due to a lack of systematic knowledge. Aim: To summarize oral health guidelines focused on the comprehensiveness component of PHC in the health system and on the intersectoral component of health promotion and disease prevention actions in five selected countries. Methods: An integrative review of scientific and grey literature was led. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and Brazil were selected. Content analysis was performed based on the comprehensiveness of care and health promotion and disease prevention categories. Results: Forty-one studies were selected to compose the review. Regarding the comprehensiveness of care, the horizontal dimension was more prominent, suggesting that oral care should be provided in cooperation with other health areas. Health promotion and disease prevention actions in intersectoral contexts are complex but seem to be effective. Programs for spreading access to fluorides and actions with the education sector are the most established ones. Conclusion: The integration of oral health in PHC policies is recommended in the guidelines of all countries, however, it stills represents a major challenge for the health care systems. These guidelines represent an important source to support decision-makers, policy-makers and stakeholders.

Indexed as

Health policyOral healthPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID37383499
PMCPMC10297506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.