ArticleHealth policy OPEN2021
An audit of surgical site infections among Omani travelers to India for spinal surgery.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paying the Price for Beauty Abroad:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many Omani nationals travel to India for Spine surgery. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in these patients is considered more than normal. The indications for surgery are also deemed liberal. Objective: To determine whether SSI rates are more in medical tourists. Materials & Methods: Design: The submission is a retrospective observational study done at a tertiary care referral hospital in Oman. The participants were a cohort of 125 patients who had travelled to India for spine surgery between January 2013 and December 2015. Their data was retrieved from the hospital information system. They were evaluated for satisfaction, residual complaints, surgical site infection and putative indications for surgery. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. The SSI rates were compared to a group of patients treated in-house during the same period. Results: All the surgeries done were in the private sector. Fifty-four of the 80 cases were advised surgery locally as well, while 26 were advised against intervention. There were 15 cases of SSI, 10 of them needing re-operation. Four patients had neurological deterioration with 2 wrong level surgeries. Discussion & Conclusions: The rate of SSI in medical tourism patients was 12% compared to the 2.7% native cases. There was a 78% chance of improvement when the surgery was locally approved and 74% chance of worsening when not approved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.