Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383485›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in health services2023

Implementation of non-insulin-dependent diabetes self-management education (DSME) in LMICs: a systematic review of cost, adoption, acceptability, and fidelity in resource-constrained settings.

Reilly Fitzpatrick, Shubhra Pant, Jamie Li, Rebecca Ritterman, Deborah Adenikinju, Chukwuemeka Iloegbu, John Pateña, Dorice Vieira, Joyce Gyamfi, Emmanuel Peprah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reilly Fitzpatrick *NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Shubhra Pant *NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Jamie LiNYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Rebecca RittermanNYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Deborah AdenikinjuGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Chukwuemeka IloegbuGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
John PateñaGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Dorice VieiraGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Joyce GyamfiGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Emmanuel PeprahGlobal Health Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISEE Lab, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type II diabetes (T2D), is a serious health issue accounting for 10.7% of mortality globally. 80% of cases worldwide are found in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), with rapidly increasing prevalence. Diabetes-self management education (DSME) is a cost-effective program that provides at-risk individuals with the knowledge and skills they need to adopt lifestyle changes that will improve their health and well-being. This systematic review examined the application of DSME in LMICs and identified the corresponding implementation results (cost, fidelity, acceptance, and adoption) associated with successful implementation in low-resource settings. Methods and analysis: The available research on T2D and the use of DSME in LMIC were systematically searched for using six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PAIS, and EBSCO Discovery) between the months of October and November of 2022. The articles that met the search criteria were subsequently imported into EndNote and Covidence for analysis. The Cochrane RoB methodology for randomized trials was used to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) in the included studies. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the results. Results: A total of 773 studies were imported for screening, after 203 duplicates were removed, 570 remained. Abstract and title screenings resulted in the exclusion of 487 articles, leaving 83 for full-text review. Following a full-text review, 76 articles were excluded and seven were found to be relevant to our search. The most common reasons for exclusion were study design ( Conclusion: Our systemic review found that DSME can be an acceptable and cost-effective solution in LMIC. While we intended to analyze cost, adoption, acceptability, and fidelity, our investigation revealed a gap in the literature on those areas, with most studies focusing on acceptability and cost and no studies identifying fidelity or adoption. To further evaluate the efficacy of DSME and enhance health outcomes for T2D in LMICs, more research is needed on its application. Systematic Review Registration: osf.io/7482t.

Indexed as

acceptabilityadoptioncostDSMEfidelityimplementation outcomesLMICT2D

Identifiers

PMID37383485
PMCPMC10294677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.