ArticleBrain & spine2023
Neurosurgical treatment in elderly patients with Traumatic brain injury: A 20-year follow-up study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Premorbid Function and Comorbidities in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Surgical Versus Medical Management in Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Beyond the bone flap: integrating biomarkers, imaging, and emerging technologies in the surgical continuum of acute subdural hematoma (ASDH).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Etiology-specific optimal timing of surgical intervention for intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Improving the management of acute subdural hematomas; identifying characteristics associated with acute subdural hematoma size and expansion.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Mortality in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Polytrauma Patients at a European Level 1 Trauma Centre-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Consensus on the management of traumatic brain injury in older adults: Results from a Delphi study.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- The death of a neurotrauma trial lessons learned from the prematurely halted randomized evaluation of surgery in elderly with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (RESET-ASDH) trial.Brain & spine · 2024Article
- Outcome after decompressive craniectomy in older adults after traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The role of neurorehabilitation in neurotrauma: A global perspective.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury in the elderly population can have a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. In this regard, successful treatment strategies are hard to define to date. Research question: In order to facilitate further insight, this study assessed outcomes following acute subdural hematoma evacuation in patients aged ≥65 years in a large patient series. Material and methods: A manual screening of the clinical records of 2999 TBI patients aged ≥65 years, admitted to the University Hospital Leuven (Belgium) between 1999 and 2019, was performed. Results: A total of 149 patients were identified with aSDH, of whom 32 underwent early surgery, 33 underwent delayed surgery and 84 were treated conservatively. Patients who underwent early surgery had the lowest median GCS, poorest Marshall CT scores, longest hospital and ICU stay, and highest intensive care unit admission and redo surgery rates. 30-d mortality was 21.9% in patients undergoing early surgery, 3.0% in patients undergoing late surgery and 16.7% in patients who were treated conservatively. Discussion and conclusion: In conclusion, patients in whom surgery could not be delayed had the worst presentation and poorest outcomes as opposed in patients in whom delay was possible. Surprisingly, patients treated conservatively had worse outcomes than those treated with delayed surgery. These results might indicate that if the GCS at admission is still adequate, an initial strategy of waiting and seeing might be associated with better outcomes. Future prospective studies with sufficient sample size are warranted to draw more definitive conclusions on the value of early vs. late surgery in elderly patients with aSDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.