Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383431›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2023

Anterior To Psoas lumbar and lumbosacral combined with posterior reconstruction in Adult Spinal Deformity: A bicentric European study.

Marco Teli, Giuseppe E Umana, Paolo Palmisciano, Maggie K Lee, Simon R Clark, Christian Soda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined anterior-posterior versus posterior only approach for surgical management of adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco TeliDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Giuseppe E UmanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Paolo PalmiscianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Maggie K LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Simon R ClarkDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Christian SodaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Borgo Roma, Verona, Italy.
University of Liverpool · GBOspedale Cannizzaro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral lumbar fusion via the trans-psoas approach is popular in adult deformity reconstruction. To overcome its limitations (neurological damage to the plexus and lack of applicability to the lumbosacral junction), a modified anterior-to-psoas (ATP) approach has been described and used. Research question: To investigate the results of ATP lumbar and lumbosacral fusion, in a cohort of adult patients treated with combined anteroposterior approaches for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Materials and methods: ASD patients surgically treated at two tertiary spinal centres were followed up. Forty patients were treated with combined ATP and posterior surgery: 11 with open lumbar lateral interbody-fusions (lumbotomy LLIF) and 29 with lesser invasive oblique lateral interbody-fusions (OLIF). Preoperative demographics, aetiology, clinical characteristics, and spinopelvic parameters were comparable between the two cohorts. Results: At a minimum 2-year follow-up, both cohorts showed significant improvements in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), i.e. Visual Analogue Scale and Core Outcome Measures Index, as well as radiological parameters, with no significant differences based on the type of surgical approach. No significant differences were found in major (P ​= ​0.457) and minor (P ​= ​0.071) complications between the two cohorts. Discusson and conclusion: Anterolateral lumbar interbody fusions, whether performed via a direct or oblique approach, proved to be safe and effective adjuvants to posterior surgery in patients with ASD. No significant complication differences were noted between techniques. In addition, the anterior-to-psoas approaches limited the risks of post-operative pseudoarthrosis by providing solid anterior support to lumbar and lumbosacral segments, demonstrating a positive impact on PROMS.

Indexed as

Adult spinal deformityLateral lumbar interbody fusionOblique lateral interbody fusionPROMSpinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID37383431
PMCPMC10293315
OpenAlexW4318938669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.