ArticleInternational journal of organ transplantation medicine2022
Development of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Liver Transplant (FACT-LT) Scale.
Article in International journal of organ transplantation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used among liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and methodological quality appraisal.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to propose an initial development of the FACT-Liver Transplant (FACT-LT) scale to assess the major physical and emotional concerns of patients before and after Orthotopic Liver transplant (OLT) due to acute and chronic liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The FACT-LT was developed in two phases. In Phase I, items were generated: 1) through interviews with 10 OLT experts and 15 candidates for or recipients of both oncological and non-oncological OLT which identified relevant topics; 2) from the FACIT item bank. In Phase II, a questionnaire to assess item frequency, applicability, and comprehension was administered to 20 OLT experts and, to assess item difficulty, embarrassment and content irrelevance, to 30 transplant recipients or candidate patients (15 oncological, 15 non-oncological). Results: In Phase I, 44 items were formulated/reviewed, and 30 items were maintained. All the healthcare professionals interviewed rejected the recommendation to develop two different modules for cancer and non-cancer patients. In Phase II, the majority of the experts and patients expressed an overall satisfaction with the questionnaire, indicating that the items were relevant, comprehensible and not embarrassing (range 75% - 99%). The first version of the FACT-LT includes 28 items defining four QOL domains: 5 items relating to Physical Well-Being, 8 to Functional Well-Being, 13 to Emotional Well-Being, and 2 to Social/Family Well-Being. Conclusion: The preliminary results obtained were promising; however further studies are needed, in order to proceed with a FACT-LT validation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37383419PMC10294034W4382501523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.