ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
A simple and accurate LC‑MS/MS method for monitoring cyclosporin A that is suitable for high throughput analysis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With time, the number of samples in clinical laboratories from therapeutic drug monitoring has increased. Existing analytical methods for blood cyclosporin A (CSA) monitoring, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and immunoassays, have limitations including cross-reactivity, time consumption, and the complicated procedures involved. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has long been considered the reference standard owing to its high accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. However, large numbers of blood samples, multi-step preparation procedures, and longer analytical times (2.5-20 min) are required as a consequence of the different technical strategies, to ensure good analytical performance and routine quality assurance. A stable, reliable, and high throughput detection method will save personnel time and reduce laboratory costs. Therefore, a high throughput and simple LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the detection of whole-blood CSA with CSA-d12 as the internal standard in the present study. Whole blood samples were prepared through a modified one-step protein precipitation method. A C18 column (50x2.1 mm, 2.7 µm) with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.5 ml/min was used for chromatographic separation with a total running time of 4.3 min to avoid the matrix effect. To protect the mass spectrometer, only part of the sample after LC separation was allowed to enter the mass spectrum, using two HPLC systems coupled to one mass spectrometry. In this way, throughput was improved with detection of two samples possible within 4.3 min using a shorter analytical time for each sample of 2.15 min. This modified LC-MS/MS method showed excellent analytical performance and demonstrated less matrix effect and a wide linear range. The design of multi-LC systems coupled with one mass spectrometry may play a notable role in the improvement of daily detection throughput, speeding up LC-MS/MS, and allowing it to be an integral part of continuous diagnostics in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.