ArticleProceedings of the ... Asia-Pacific bioinformatics conference2023
Tuning Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Genomic Studies Using Selective SNP Hiding.
Article in Proceedings of the ... Asia-Pacific bioinformatics conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Genomic privacy preservation in genome-wide association studies: taxonomy, limitations, challenges, and vision.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- From molecules to genomic variations: Accelerating genome analysis via intelligent algorithms and architectures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers need a rich trove of genomic datasets that they can leverage to gain a better understanding of the genetic basis of the human genome and identify associations between phenol-types and specific parts of DNA. However, sharing genomic datasets that include sensitive genetic or medical information of individuals can lead to serious privacy-related consequences if data lands in the wrong hands. Restricting access to genomic datasets is one solution, but this greatly reduces their usefulness for research purposes. To allow sharing of genomic datasets while addressing these privacy concerns, several studies propose privacy-preserving mechanisms for data sharing. Differential privacy is one of such mechanisms that formalize rigorous mathematical foundations to provide privacy guarantees while sharing aggregated statistical information about a dataset. Nevertheless, it has been shown that the original privacy guarantees of DP-based solutions degrade when there are dependent tuples in the dataset, which is a common scenario for genomic datasets (due to the existence of family members). In this work, we introduce a new mechanism to mitigate the vulnerabilities of the inference attacks on differentially private query results from genomic datasets including dependent tuples. We propose a utility-maximizing and privacy-preserving approach for sharing statistics by hiding selective SNPs of the family members as they participate in a genomic dataset. By evaluating our mechanism on a real-world genomic dataset, we empirically demonstrate that our proposed mechanism can achieve up to 40% better privacy than state-of-the-art DP-based solutions, while near-optimally minimizing utility loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37383349PMC10306260W4382501862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.