Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383317›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2020

Recommendations for the reform of medical education in China: A SWOT analysis.

Jacob S Nasser, Kevin C Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob S NasserSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kevin C ChungSection of Plastic Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenomenon: Numerous political, demographic, and policy changes have influenced the evolving structure of healthcare in China. As China continues to experience healthcare reform, the medical educational system should strive for parallel advancement. Approach: We conducted a review of the literature to describe the nature of healthcare reform in China and establish recommendations for the reform of medical education. Specifically, we aim to summarize the current challenges faced by medical education in China and identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the development of new medical schools. Findings: The Chinese medical education system is currently experiencing problems in organization, training, standardization, and evaluation. New medical schools in China have an immense opportunity to be a disruptive force in healthcare by introducing business and engineering concepts into the curriculum, research enterprise, and clinical delivery. Insights: The need for physicians capable of meeting the healthcare needs of the Chinese population only becomes more imperative as the population continues to grow and change. Given the numerous challenges experienced by healthcare professionals, new medical schools have the ability to adopt strategies used by the United States, United Kingdom, among other countries, to establish a robust, effective medical education system.

Indexed as

ChinaCurriculumHealthcare reformMedical educationSWOT analysis

Identifiers

PMID37383317
PMCPMC10297748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.