Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383294›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis on sub-microscopic

Nimita Deora, C P Yadav, Veena Pande, Abhinav Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pediatric MixedChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nimita DeoraICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
C P YadavICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
Veena PandeDepartment of Biotechnology, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
Abhinav SinhaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The long-term maintenance of parasite biomass below the detection threshold of microscopy may stymie malaria elimination. Variation in microscopists' competencies to detect and correctly identify parasite species reflect in microscopy sensitivity, resulting in incorrect species-specific burden. Methods: The study estimated Findings: A total of 17,449 samples from 39 districts were examined for Interpretation: Primary regional data in the form of SMIs hot spots should be generated from countries on the verge of malaria elimination, and genetic monitoring should be integrated into national programs, particularly in key areas for successful malaria elimination. Funding: Not applicable.

Indexed as

PlasmodiumSub-microscopic infections

Identifiers

PMID37383294
PMCPMC10305983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.