ArticleIranian journal of pathology2023
Prognostic Implication and Survival Outcomes of Perioperative Blood Transfusion on Urological Malignancies Undergoing Radical Surgical Intervention.
Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: Background and objective: Perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) during radical urological surgeries has been associated with an increased incidence of complications. The present study analyzes the outcome of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and the prognostic implications after radical surgeries on patients with malignant urological tumors. Methods: Our retrospective study included 792 cases of partial or radical nephrectomy /cystectomy/prostatectomy surgeries for kidney/bladder/ prostate carcinoma from 2012 to 2022. Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and pathological parameters were evaluated. PBT was taken as a period of transfusion of allogenic RBC during/preoperative/postoperative surgeries. The effect of PBT on oncological parameters like recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-free survival (CSS) was compared using univariate cox regression analysis (Odds ratio, Hazard ratio). Results: PBT was applied on 124 (20.6%) patients of nephrectomy, 54 (46.5%) patients of cystectomy, and 23 (31%) patients of prostatectomy. The baseline characteristics of the cohort study found symptomatic patients with older age and other co-morbidities to be transfusion-dependent. Also, the patients undergoing radical operations with more blood loss and advanced tumor stage were more likely to receive PBT. PBT was significantly associated with survival outcomes ( Conclusion: The result of this study concludes that in nephrectomy and cystectomy operations, PBT had a significant association with cancer recurrence and mortality; however, in prostatectomy cases, no significant correlation was noted. Thus, proper criteria to prevent the unnecessary use of PBT and more defined parameters for transfusion are needed to improve postoperative survival. Autologous transfusion should be considered more frequently. However, more extensive studies and randomized trials are needed in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.