Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383127›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Review of deep learning and artificial intelligence models in fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Farzan Vahedifard, Jubril O Adepoju, Mark Supanich, Hua Asher Ai, Xuchu Liu, Mehmet Kocak, Kranthi K Marathu, Sharon E Byrd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Farzan VahedifardDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States. farzan_vahedifard@rush.edu.
Jubril O AdepojuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Mark SupanichDivision for Diagnostic Medical Physics, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Hua Asher AiDivision for Diagnostic Medical Physics, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Xuchu LiuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Mehmet KocakDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Kranthi K MarathuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.
Sharon E ByrdDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 606012, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system abnormalities in fetuses are fairly common, happening in 0.1% to 0.2% of live births and in 3% to 6% of stillbirths. So initial detection and categorization of fetal Brain abnormalities are critical. Manually detecting and segmenting fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be time-consuming, and susceptible to interpreter experience. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and machine learning approaches have a high potential for assisting in the early detection of these problems, improving the diagnosis process and follow-up procedures. The use of AI and machine learning techniques in fetal brain MRI was the subject of this narrative review paper. Using AI, anatomic fetal brain MRI processing has investigated models to predict specific landmarks and segmentation automatically. All gestation age weeks (17-38 wk) and different AI models (mainly Convolutional Neural Network and U-Net) have been used. Some models' accuracy achieved 95% and more. AI could help preprocess and post-process fetal images and reconstruct images. Also, AI can be used for gestational age prediction (with one-week accuracy), fetal brain extraction, fetal brain segmentation, and placenta detection. Some fetal brain linear measurements, such as Cerebral and Bone Biparietal Diameter, have been suggested. Classification of brain pathology was studied using diagonal quadratic discriminates analysis, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, naive Bayes, and radial basis function neural network classifiers. Deep learning methods will become more powerful as more large-scale, labeled datasets become available. Having shared fetal brain MRI datasets is crucial because there aren not many fetal brain pictures available. Also, physicians should be aware of AI's function in fetal brain MRI, particularly neuroradiologists, general radiologists, and perinatologists.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFetal brainMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37383127
PMCPMC10294149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.