ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023
Review of deep learning and artificial intelligence models in fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- In Vivo Assessment of Placental Structure and Perfusion in Late-Gestation Pregnancies and Their Association With Fetal Growth.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- MDIFN: a deep learning-based multi-dimensional interaction fusion network for placental MRI segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning based gestational age estimation from multi-view fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Expanding Frontier: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Placenta segmentation redefined: review of deep learning integration of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Review
- Utility of Biometric Measurements from Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Improved Antenatal Diagnosis of Dandy-Walker Spectrum Posterior Fossa Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research advancements in the Use of artificial intelligence for prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Fetal MRI deep learning segmentation of body and lung in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Fetal MRI Analysis of Corpus Callosal Abnormalities: Classification, and Associated Anomalies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic Localization of the Pons and Vermis on Fetal Brain MR Imaging Using a U-Net Deep Learning Model.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Automatic Ventriculomegaly Detection in Fetal Brain MRI: A Step-by-Step Deep Learning Model for Novel 2D-3D Linear Measurements.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training integrates women's and children's health with life-course brain capital strategies: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system abnormalities in fetuses are fairly common, happening in 0.1% to 0.2% of live births and in 3% to 6% of stillbirths. So initial detection and categorization of fetal Brain abnormalities are critical. Manually detecting and segmenting fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be time-consuming, and susceptible to interpreter experience. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and machine learning approaches have a high potential for assisting in the early detection of these problems, improving the diagnosis process and follow-up procedures. The use of AI and machine learning techniques in fetal brain MRI was the subject of this narrative review paper. Using AI, anatomic fetal brain MRI processing has investigated models to predict specific landmarks and segmentation automatically. All gestation age weeks (17-38 wk) and different AI models (mainly Convolutional Neural Network and U-Net) have been used. Some models' accuracy achieved 95% and more. AI could help preprocess and post-process fetal images and reconstruct images. Also, AI can be used for gestational age prediction (with one-week accuracy), fetal brain extraction, fetal brain segmentation, and placenta detection. Some fetal brain linear measurements, such as Cerebral and Bone Biparietal Diameter, have been suggested. Classification of brain pathology was studied using diagonal quadratic discriminates analysis, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, naive Bayes, and radial basis function neural network classifiers. Deep learning methods will become more powerful as more large-scale, labeled datasets become available. Having shared fetal brain MRI datasets is crucial because there aren not many fetal brain pictures available. Also, physicians should be aware of AI's function in fetal brain MRI, particularly neuroradiologists, general radiologists, and perinatologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.