Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37383092›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2022

Geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in the double burden of malnutrition among women in Southeast Asia: A population-based study.

Tuhin Biswas, Nick Townsend, Ricardo Magalhaes, Md Mehedi Hasan, Abdullah Al Mamun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and Correlates of Underweight among Women of Reproductive Age in Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tuhin BiswasInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nick TownsendDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Ricardo MagalhaesUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.
Md Mehedi HasanInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abdullah Al MamunInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Countries in the South and Southeast Asia region grapple with significant challenges due to the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) in women. An understanding of the country specific DBM geographical and socioeconomic distribution in South and Southeast Asian countries will enable targeting of DBM interventions towards high-risk populations in the region. This study aimed to analyse anthropometric indicators for women's nutrition at national and subnational levels in seven South and Southeast Asian countries and assess the association between nutritional status and socioeconomic factors. Methods: We used population-representative cross-sectional data from the Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2000 and 2017, for seven South and Southeast Asian countries (Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, and Timor-Leste) and estimated national and subnational prevalence of women underweight and overweight. Using a concentration index (CI), we measured relative and absolute inequality across underweight and overweight in urban and rural areas in these countries. In addition, we estimated the health achievement index, integrating mean coverage of nutritional status and the distribution of coverage by rural and urban populations. Findings: The prevalence of underweight women ranged from 7.0% (95% CI: 7.0-8.0%) in Pakistan in 2017 to 44.0% (95% CI: 42-45%) in Bangladesh in 2000 and overweight from 11.0% (95% CI: 10-12%) in Bangladesh in 2000 to 67.0% (95% CI: 66-68%) in Pakistan in 2017. In most countries, underweight disproportionately affected the poorest. The concentration indices for underweight were significant in all countries and ranged from -0.04 in Cambodia in 2014 to -0.38 in Pakistan in 2017. In contrast, overweight disproportionately affected the richest, with concentration indices for overweight significant in all countries, ranging from 0.16 in Cambodia in 2010 to 0.45 in Bangladesh in 2007. In most of the countries an absolute measure of inequality decreased overtime, whereas relative measures increased. Disachievement of underweight is more pronounced in rural populations compared to the urban ones. Interpretations: We noted large geographical and socioeconomic disparities in women DBM in South and Southeast Asian countries, at national and subnational levels. Planning, implementation, and evaluation of existing intervention programmes for food and nutrition should be based on subnational level needs and outcomes. Funding: This research is partially funded by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (Project ID CE200100025).

Indexed as

Double burden of malnutritionGeographicalSocioeconomic inequalities

Identifiers

PMID37383092
PMCPMC10305935
OpenAlexW4281400917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.